(Fwd) Re: Nameserver registrations by lusers

["Rick H. Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>]

This is a message from guard-talk, an InterNic mailing list
about the gardian software. Regestries are going to have to
deal with things like this.

IMHO it will be compounded by the number of regestries
developed in this process.

-Rick

--- Forwarded mail from Chris Linstruth <cjl@QNET.COM>

Date:         Fri, 3 Jan 1997 14:31:35 -0800
Reply-To: Chris Linstruth <cjl@QNET.COM>
From: Chris Linstruth <cjl@QNET.COM>
Subject:      Re: Nameserver registrations by lusers
To: Multiple recipients of list GUARD-TALK
              <GUARD-TALK@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET>

On Fri, 3 Jan 1997, Domain Administrator wrote:

>
>
> > >   2. send a message back to the InterNIC telling us
> > >      this person/company is not authorized to use
> > >      the listed names server(s).
>
> And have to take an active hostile stance to a potential customer.
>
> The _default_ case, with no action required by the operator of a
> nameserver, should be that individuals other than that operator, NOT have
> permission to use those servers. It should at least be an option.
>
> I recently spoke with Mark K. about this and other concerns, and he
> estimates BEFORE-USE will be implemented late this quarter or early next.

Okay, great.

INTERNIC:

How about an official statement regarding the planned implementation
of the BEFORE-USE aspects of the Guardian system?

This second-hand info is valuable, but not enough.

--
Chris Linstruth  -  cjl@qnet.com



---End of forwarded mail from Chris Linstruth <cjl@QNET.COM>

-- 
Rick H. Wesson