[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is shared generally agreed, then?
- Date: Mon, 06 Jan 1997 10:05:56 -0500
- From: Bob Helfant <bhelfant@globecomm.net>
- Subject: Re: Is shared generally agreed, then?
There will be no convincing concensus without a vote, only divided
opinions. I do not understand why this idea was quickly shot down. It is
the only way to find out what percentage of people support each issue. It
is one of the corner stones of democracy..
Bob Helfant
Globecomm, Inc.
At 12:37 PM 1/4/97 -0800, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>With all the talk about CORE, and how central registries and depositories
>should work, is it a safe assumption that the shared model has received
>consensus? If not, why is nobody speaking up?
>
>What about the 60-day issue? Consensus for or against?
>
>What about the lottery? Number of participants or no limit? What about the
>gTLDs to be created? Is the fact that the draft calls for only 7 and that
>the IAHC will decide them going to be approved, then, without much more
>comment?
>
>The holidays are quite over, so I must assume that everyone is back and that
>nobody cares anymore. Is everyone awake?
>
>Will the IAHC publish an interim draft based on comment to date? There is
>precious little time left in the public comment phase, an interim draft would
>go a very long way towards demonstratig that public comment is, indeed, being
>taken into account.
>--
>Christopher Ambler
>President, Image Online Design, Inc.
>