[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 60 day waiting peroid.
- Date: Mon, 06 Jan 1997 11:50:21 -0800
- From: Einar Stefferud <Stef@nma.com>
- Subject: Re: 60 day waiting peroid.
So Dave, with a 60 day waiting period, the willful challenger just
waits till day 59 and then lodges a complaint.
Are you saying that the prudent business person will wait until day 61
to start investing?
Are you speaking for yourself when you say such a thing?
Is there really how you operated when you set up IMC.ORG?
Why do I seriously doubt that you behave the way you predict that
others will? In short, I do not believe you;-)...
Why do I find so many of the supporting comments about 60 days are
full of unsupported hypothetical expectations of human behavior, and
no foundation in law to support how 60 days of waiting (or any days of
waiting) will actually make anything good happen.
I remain entirely unconvinced. Best...\Stef
>From Dave Crocker's message Fri, 20 Dec 1996 18:48:57 -0800:
}
}At 4:16 PM -0800 12/20/96, Michael Dillon wrote:
}>This means that the registry acts on behalf of potential disputants for
}>60 days and against name registrants. This is not a neutral role.
}
}Question about a tradeoff:
}
}1. You register a name and begin to use it immediately. You "invest" in
}that name significantly, even if only to place it on your business cards.
}Along comes someone contesting your use and take you to court and forces
}you to give it up. Start over, having wasted time and money, and having to
}re-inform folks of your new/next name.
}
}2. You register a name and wait 2 months. You are challenged and have to
}give up the name. YOu have little invested, since you haven't started
}using it.
}
} I would choose 2. What makes it so onerous?
}
}d/