[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Repository services and budget
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 1997 02:00:48 +0000
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Subject: Re: Repository services and budget
Dave,
Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> At 9:04 AM -0800 1/4/97, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> >As an ISP that grew from 1 server to about 9 within a year I would suggest
> >adding the following: a test system (new OS versions, new DB versions,
>
> Let me push back, a bit, on this, to see how you and others react:
>
> Starting with 3 operational systems means that reliability is
> inherently quite high. Taking one of those systems offline to use as a
> testing machine isn't horrible. As more servers are added, the statistics
> get even better.
>
> >etc.), a backup system (not simply tar to DAT), but something like ADSM
> >for networkign b/u's, 256Mb ot 512MB of memory for DB systems (most
> >software runs better with more memory and the DB systems are all memory
> >hogs), RAID or SSI disks so as to improve reliablity on the DB servers.
> >Basically $10K per server is too low in my opinion. Look at $30K.
>
> Given the full redundancy of systems, I would guess that RAID is
> (parden the pun) unnecessarily redunant. RAID is important for avoiding a
> single-point of failure problem; but that is solved differently is the
> proposed, multi-server arrangement. (Now, RAID for performance may well be
> a different issue. I don't have a solid enough feel for current
> performance to claim to know the definitive answer on this.)
Pardon me here, but I believe that the redundancy in RAID is a
advantage
for these perposes, depending on what level you use.
>
> >Then a test system at $30K and a backup system at $30K and your servers
> >have gone up from $30K to $150K.
>
> I'd guess that 60-$100K would suffice. What do other folks think
> about this?
I would tend to agree here with you Dave, depending on memory configs.
>
> >
> >Is a secretary necessary? There will be much admin work that needs to be
> >done so I would assume so.
>
> Remember this this is a back-end organization. It's "customers"
> are the member registrars. Initially, that is a very small number. After
> two years, it's still only around 40-50. My guess is that technical
> support staff are going to be more important than a purely
> adminitrative/receptionis kind of person.
Agreed here as well. But a small admin staff would be necessary as
well.
>
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group.
Phone :972-447-1878
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com