Re: Is shared generally agreed...NO!

[Joe Kelsey <joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us>]

Jeff Williams writes:
 > Leo Smith wrote:
 > > Not by a long shot. The issues surrounding the shared versus exclusive
 > > have been sufficiently aired by those in this discussion group. There
 > > are those in this group that adamently opposed a shared model, and I
 > > am one. We now wait for the revision to see which way the IAHC members
 > > will go...
 >   I also oppose a totaly shared model myself.  As do many others that
 > have posted here.  But as you say, we shall see if the members have 
 > truely listened.

Far more people support the shared model than that miniscule minority
who keeps yelling about the private model. Jeff, Leo, Chris, Karl and
Palmer are the only ones who have spoken against the shared model. Chris
has expressed his willingness to abide by the shared model. Palmer is
violently opposed to any scheme where he will actually have to use his
brain to figure out how to make a business work. Jeff and Leo have
asserted no real argument against the shared model except to say that it
is ``unproven'' technology despite everyone's attempt to show them
existing examples of the technology in action.

So, I think that we can safely say that the shared model has complete
consensus.

/Joe