Re: Is shared generally agreed...NO!

[Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.com>]

At 5:00 PM -0800 1/8/97, Joe Kelsey wrote:

> Jeff Williams writes:
>  > Leo Smith wrote:
>  > > Not by a long shot. The issues surrounding the shared versus exclusive
>  > > have been sufficiently aired by those in this discussion group. There
>  > > are those in this group that adamently opposed a shared model, and I
>  > > am one. We now wait for the revision to see which way the IAHC members
>  > > will go...
>  >   I also oppose a totaly shared model myself.  As do many others that
>  > have posted here.  But as you say, we shall see if the members have
>  > truely listened.
>
> Far more people support the shared model than that miniscule minority
> who keeps yelling about the private model. Jeff, Leo, Chris, Karl and
> Palmer are the only ones who have spoken against the shared model. Chris
> has expressed his willingness to abide by the shared model. Palmer is
> violently opposed to any scheme where he will actually have to use his
> brain to figure out how to make a business work. Jeff and Leo have
> asserted no real argument against the shared model except to say that it
> is ``unproven'' technology despite everyone's attempt to show them
> existing examples of the technology in action.
>
> So, I think that we can safely say that the shared model has complete
> consensus.
>

What has consensus is balance. That requires appropriate registry model
for the use of the delegation. That includes shared and non-shared in
their respective places.


Regards,

Simon

--
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.