Re: 60 day waiting peroid.

[Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>]

At 11:09 AM -0800 1/9/97, Simon Higgs wrote:
>That's flawed logic. What the IAHC has done in the draft is provide a
>mechanism for the legal industry to control the delegation of

	The proposal creates no paths of recourse that do not already
exist.  On the other hand, it does ELIMINATE one that is currently in use,
namely independent actions taken by the registrar, acting on its own
initiative.

>registrations. Every law firm will monitor the publication data and
>automatically issue challenges for the remotest similarity to an

	What makes them do that more under the new regime than they do now?
Also your implication is that the cost of placing a complaint won't have a
limiting effect.

>Another thing that you haven't defined in the charter is what happens
>after a challenge is issued. How is the eventual delegation arrived at?
>"Leaving it up to the courts" is a particularly useless reply. That
>happens already. What is the registry/registrar procedure for dealing

	Not all resolutions pertain to the courts, since the complainant
and the registrant can choose to work things out on their own.  In any
event, either the courts will direct actions of the registrar or the
registrant will.

d/

--------------------
Dave Crocker                                             +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting                              fax: +1 408 249 6205
675 Spruce Dr.                                  dcrocker@brandenburg.com
Sunnyvale CA 94086 USA                        http://www.brandenburg.com

Internet Mail Consortium                http://www.imc.org, info@imc.org