[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?



Vince,

Vince Wolodkin wrote:
> 
> Leo Smith wrote:
> >
> >I personally believe that the number of lawyer letters
> > threatening legal action, and the number of lawsuits filed, over
> > trademark issues as they apply to domain names, will not be
> > effectively reduced (if at all) by the institution of a wait.
> 
> I totally agree with you here and would like to strengthen your last
> sentence.
> 
> You say:
> 
> > was? I personally believe that the number of lawyer letters
> > threatening legal action, and the number of lawsuits filed, over
> > trademark issues as they apply to domain names, will not be
> > effectively reduced (if at all) by the institution of a wait.
> 
> I would change the last line as follows:
> 
> effectively reduced (if at all) by ANYTHING THE IAHC OR CORE THINKS THEY
> MIGHT DO.
> 
> Staying out of it is the best bet, completely and irrevocably staying
> out of it.  Learn from NSI's mistake.  Right now you are repeating NSI's
> mistake.  You, like they, are believing that there is something you can
> do outside of normal legal processes to minimize lawsuits.

  I agree as well with this analogy and recomendation.  Did you read
Bettys posting.  I found it quite reveling along these lines.  I might
add that unless IAHC/CORE has regulatory authority, implying or 
stating a 60 day waiting period as a condition for use of a TLD, is
not maintainable, no has force behind it.  It can omly drag IAHC/CORE
into a legal situation at some point that would be untenable, and creat
an atmosphere of being very "NSI LIKE" in its behavior.  This I think
would be detramental to all involved. especailly the user.
> 
> No matter how you slice it, it comes up peanuts:-)  Uh oh, did I just
> infringe???
> 
> Vince Wolodkin

Regards,
-- 
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group. 
Phone :972-447-1878
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com