Re: Is shared generally agreed...NO!

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Joe and all,

Joe Kelsey wrote:
> 
> Leo Smith writes:
>  > There are 5 people in you count that are opposed to the shared model. In
>  > order for your conclusion to be true that these 5 people represent a
>  > miniscule minority , then the number of supporters of the shared model must
>  > necessarily be overwhelming. For 5 people to represent a miniscule minority
>  > there must be hundreds of supporters of the shared model out there and no
>  > others supporting the exclusive model.
> 
> Out of more than 300 people on this list, an absolutely miniscule
> minority of 5 noisy people keep saying the same thing over and over and
> over and over and over...

  I must agree to a degree here that some arguments sem to be
repetitive,
but certainly NOT by the SAME people.  

  MR. Kelsey, you need to review the archives badly!  You make a partial
point here (Rare for you), but only partial.
> 
> Just because you enjoy repeating yourself does not make you right and it
> does not serve the obvious consensus forming over the shared model.

  You have been repeating yourself over and over and over again as well
with you continueing missrepresentation of the facts.  There IS NO
obvious CONSENSUS on a shared model, presently.

  It is however obvious, that you have not been following the discussion
and argument in several reguards.  Unfortunate.    

  

Regards,
-- 
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group. 
Phone :972-447-1878
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com