[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 60 day period
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 17:10:58 -0800 (PST)
- From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Subject: Re: 60 day period
Christopher Palermo allegedly said:
[...]
>
> I disagree. The waiting period serves the legitimate purpose of relieving
> the court system of the huge burden of private litigation over trademark and > domain name rights.
Not to put to fine a point on it, that's a dozen lawsuits out of
800000 registrations. Characterizing that as a "huge burden of
private litigation" is stretching things beyond reason.
> Those who have been though even one hotly contested
> intellectual property lawsuit know that it can be a terrific waste of human
> energy and court resources.
60 days times 800000 represents an enormous waste of human energy, as well.
>The waiting period recognizes that we ought to
> reserve court time for more important disputes. The benefit to the court
> system is worth the inconvenience to the registrant.
In the grand scheme of things, domain name proceedings are a tiny,
miniscule fraction of court resources. Traffic cases in a single big
city are a bigger load. It's true that trademark/domain name cases involve
more extensive legal resources on an individual basis, and the
specialized lawyers involved are not cheap. But on the whole,
trademark/domain name cases are in the noise.
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com,kc@llnl.gov the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: 5A 16 DA 04 31 33 40 1E 87 DA 29 02 97 A3 46 2F