Re: 60 Day Wait

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Dave,

Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
> At 3:30 AM -0800 1/11/97, Kevin Brown wrote:
> >Guess I will tell people that the old ways are best, that RFCs are ignored
> 
>         Not all RFCs are standards.  If the IAHC is violating any Internet
> standards, please specify which.

  Though it is true that not all RFC's are standards, most ARE.  Those
that
are not, most likely will be or are considered as such.  So what is your 
point reguarding RFC's and IAHC?  One in which the IACH is violating is
RFC 2065, for instance.
> 
>         If you are citing an IAHC deviation from an IANA statement, please
> note that IAHC is authorized by IANA to pursue this task and, to date and
> to my knowledge, IANA has not registered any disagreement with the details
> of the IAHC proposal.  Since I was appointed by IANA to IAHC, it's probably
> fair to assume that such disagreements would be known to me.

  Though the IANA may have "Authorized" IACH to persue this task, does
not 
necessarly give the IAHC any authority, per se.  I would agree that if
you were appointed by the IANA than you would be better aware of
dissagrements.

> 
> d/
> 
> ----------------------------
> Dave Crocker, Director                                       +1 408 246 8253
> Internet Mail Consortium                                 (f) +1 408 249 6205
> 127 Segré Place                                             dcrocker@imc.org
> Santa Cruz, CA  95060 USA                                 http://www.imc.org
> 
> [IAHC member, expressing strictly (or loosely) personal opinions]

Regards,
-- 
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group. 
Phone :972-447-1878
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com