[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IAHC Comments please!

Simon Higgs wrote:
> There is a fundamental breakdown in feedback communication between the
> IAHC and the list. This is not a one way process.

	It's fundamental, but not utterly broken: the
commitee members comment on issues they can usefully comment on.
Alas, that's more like a response to the data in the packets
than an ack for the packets (:-))
> 
> What would be very useful is some kind of FAQ that could be posted to
> address those "often repeated" questions for everyone. That would
> probably reduce the list traffic, as well as provide a useful feedback
> mechanism from the IAHC to us poor mortals. ;)

	No, no, not more FAQ work! (;-))

	Seriously, though, this could be done in part by non-committee
members.  Instead, I'd suggest the committee ask themeselves if
it ought to be done, and if so ask for volunteers.
	And no, I can't volunteer this week: I have to leave warm 
sunny Canada for a week in rainy San Francisco.

--dave
-- 
David Collier-Brown,  | Always do right. This will gratify some people
185 Ellerslie Ave.,   | astonish the rest.        -- Mark Twain
Willowdale, Ontario   | davecb@hobbes.ss.org, canada.sun.com
N2M 1Y3. 416-223-8968 | http://java.science.yorku.ca/~davecb