Re: The 60 day publication period.

[Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.com>]

At 2:29 PM -0400 6/20/97, Antony Van Couvering wrote:

So why is it still there if it is meaningless? This makes no sense.

> There was in the initial drafts a "mandatory" 60-day waiting period, but
> everyone screamed so loud they took it down and replaced it with a
> voluntary waiting period, which is essentially meaningless.
>
> Antony
>
>
> At 11:49 AM 6/20/97 +0000, Semerdjian, Steve wrote:
> >
> >Does anyone know exactly why IAHC placed this publication option into its
> >proposal? Is this a mandatory "waiting period" or can one register and have
> >their domain name effective immediately?
> >



Best Regards,

Simon

-- "We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million
typewriters will
eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare.  Now, thanks to the
Internet, we know this is not true." -- Robert Wilensky, ILP 1996