[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Warehousing

At 02:11 PM 6/21/97 +0100, Jeff Williams wrote:
>Hank,
>
>Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>> 
>> At 06:03 PM 6/20/97 +0100, Jeff Williams wrote:
>> >Richard and all,
>> >
>> >Richard Hovey wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Difficult to police.  Suppose Digital wanted a different domain in
>> >> every
>> >> > country it operated.  You gonna penalize them?
>> >>
>> >> What do you mean "suppose"?  see
>> >> http://www.itu.int/net-itu/gtld-mou/signat-d.htm
>> >
>> >  Yes, this does point out that DIgital has several diffrent
>> >signatories.
>> >One curious thing on the list is that the United States has not yet
>> >singed the gTLD-MoU yet....
>> 
>> Considering that IAHC/iPOC is *not* looking for government signatures but
>> rather for industry signatures, I don't see the problem.  -Hank
>
>  Nice try to sidetrack the problem, but won't work.  If the FCC is not
>in approval and IAHC/iPOC does not comply with the 1995
>telecommunications
>act, you don't have a implimentable plan.  In addition without the 
>US governments approval of the perposal and the gTLD-MoU, you again have
>very little basis for continueing.
>
>  I am not saying that all is lost.  Not hardly!  But without some 
>serious modification and detailing of the Perposal and the gTLD-MoU
>in the very near future, I can't see any future in it.

Just for the edification of those on pab-discuss, can you fill us in on your
background and your current position so we all understand with what
authority you are making these conclusions?

Hank

>> 
>> >>
>> >> Richard Hovey
>> >> DIGITAL
>> >
>
>Regards,
>-- 
>Jeffrey A. Williams
>DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
>Information Eng. Group. IEG. INC. 
>Phone :913-294-2375 (v-office)
>E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
>
>