Re: Warehousing

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Hank and all,

Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> 
> At 02:11 PM 6/21/97 +0100, Jeff Williams wrote:
> >Hank,
> >
> >Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> >>
> >> At 06:03 PM 6/20/97 +0100, Jeff Williams wrote:
> >> >Richard and all,
> >> >
> >> >Richard Hovey wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Difficult to police.  Suppose Digital wanted a different domain in
> >> >> every
> >> >> > country it operated.  You gonna penalize them?
> >> >>
> >> >> What do you mean "suppose"?  see
> >> >> http://www.itu.int/net-itu/gtld-mou/signat-d.htm
> >> >
> >> >  Yes, this does point out that DIgital has several diffrent
> >> >signatories.
> >> >One curious thing on the list is that the United States has not yet
> >> >singed the gTLD-MoU yet....
> >>
> >> Considering that IAHC/iPOC is *not* looking for government signatures but
> >> rather for industry signatures, I don't see the problem.  -Hank
> >
> >  Nice try to sidetrack the problem, but won't work.  If the FCC is not
> >in approval and IAHC/iPOC does not comply with the 1995
> >telecommunications
> >act, you don't have a implimentable plan.  In addition without the
> >US governments approval of the perposal and the gTLD-MoU, you again have
> >very little basis for continueing.
> >
> >  I am not saying that all is lost.  Not hardly!  But without some
> >serious modification and detailing of the Perposal and the gTLD-MoU
> >in the very near future, I can't see any future in it.
> 
> Just for the edification of those on pab-discuss, can you fill us in on your
> background and your current position so we all understand with what
> authority you are making these conclusions?

  If you are speeking to me, Jeff Williams, that I don't have any
authority what so ever other than a voting tax payer.  As to who I
am and what I do, that is in my sig file below.  Not to mention
CO-Founder of IEG. INC.  if that helps any?  We will review and
continue to review the gTLD-MoU as it progresses or not.  Upon
it reaching a point where we feel comfortable with sighning it,
we (with my signature and two others, my other co-founders) shall
sign it.  But not until that time.  Whenever that is.

  We here at IEG. do not make a habit of signing any document
that is not in bothe the intrests of our customers, the public,
and our company.  At present and in it's present form, the gTLD-MoU
is not seen by our board, as being such a document at this time.

  It neither meets the needs or desires of our customers, from our
polling, nor in our humble opinion the publics best intrest.  There
are parts of it that do meet our companys intrests, but only in 
a curserary way.

  But as Scott said earlier, without being a PAB member or some 
reasonable access to POC members, we find it unecessarly dificult
to reasonably participate in assisting in improving the verbage
of the gTLD-MoU, hence we feel that this is an unecessary impedance
to making reasonable progress towards our company and all it's
subsidearies, of signing this document.

> 
> Hank
> 
> >>
> >> >>

regards,
-- 
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group. IEG. INC. 
Phone :913-294-2375 (v-office)
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com