[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Internet Way!
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 14:30:21 -0400 (EDT)
- From: "Richard J. Sexton" <richard@sexton.org>
- Subject: Re: The Internet Way!
At 01:33 PM 7/21/97 +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>At 02:55 AM 7/21/97 -0400, Jay@Iperdome.com wrote:
>
>If you are referring to the iPOC work as the Great World Battle - you have
>been smoking some bad weed.
While the question of which group has the best weed is an intersting one
it't not likely to be settled in email. Perhaps a panel of blue ribbon
experts can be appointed.
>- iPOC does not discuss or handle any aspect of ISO country code TLDs
>- iPOC does not discuss who owns the root or how it should be managed (best
> left to IANA and the NSF)
>
>iPOC merely expands the number of TLDs from the current 3 to many more. I
>suggest everyone get an issue of Network World (June 9) and read the last
>page "Net Buzz" entitled "An Alliance Gone Awry". It goes into detail about
>eDNS and Alternic infighting (Denninger and Kashpureff)
That was of course written months ago, and in the new spirit of
cooperation that seems to be the prevailing winds these days
I'd like to point out that I've registered the following domain
names so nobody else wold grab them away for you: ipoc.org, ipoc.com,
ipoc.net and poc.net. poc.com and poc.org are taken. poc.org
was taken very recently and looks a bit dubious. Sorry I didn't
think of that one earlier.
Just let me know to who you want them transferred and I'll
do that, pronto.
Best regards,
--
richard@sexton.org (forgive me if I'm terse, I answer hundreds of e-mails
a day)
The right to revolt has sources deep in our history.
-- Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas