Re: Judge Defers AlterNIC Action

[Prysm Technical Support <support@prysm.net>]

At 11:17 AM 7/24/97 -0700, Dave Crocker / IMC wrote:
>Marc,
>
>	For complex topic, especially those ladened with considerable and
>emotional history, accurate representation of the facts is difficult.
>
>At 11:28 AM 7/24/97 -0400, Marc Hurst wrote:
>>The IANA model is broken. The US guv isn't supporting it, the Canadian 
>
>	Repeating such statements does not make them true.
>
>	As has been stated many, many time, the US government has not taken a
>position on the matter.  It's one "official" pronouncement on the matter
>was to say that it had no official position.

Am I missing something here?  If the US Government has no position on it,
then in my opinion, that DOES mean that they are not supporting it.


>>and kicking last summer? I preached that international interests must be 
>>recognised and when the MoU came out these issues were (and still are) 
>>absent.
>
>	You preached it, but that didn't make your assessment correct.  In fact,
>your position is astonishing for the degree to which it is wrong.
>

It would be nice if you shared your views instead of saying, "No, you are
wrong" and leaving it.  Isn't this a "discussion" list?!


Charles
Prysm Technical Support
support@prysm.net

-------------------------------------------------------
Prysm Technologies, Inc.
416 Travis St., Suite #804
Shreveport, LA 71101
(800) 826-9795 Toll Free             
(318) 424-1754 Fax
(318) 424-4638 Voice

Keep up to date with Prysm News: http://www.prysm.net/pnews.html

When responding to email from Prysm Technical Support, please quote back all
of the correspondence.  We need this because several people answer support
mail and may not be aware of the context in which you were speaking.