[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Internet Governance

Michael Roetto <mike@box.nl> wrote:

> An interesting thought struck me ...

What? To misuse the IETF General list? Urk! gtld-discuss was created just
for "interesting thought" to meet a means test for content.

> If this <change of discoursive system from geekery to wonkery> continues
> can anything but <partition> result?

Yes. But...

I for one would like to see the pseudo-wonkery partitioned to Mars. Please
do keep in mind that operational mechanisms are a prerequisite for policy,
as seductive as the sirens of pure policy may be.

> Does the new POC really represent all the stakeholders in ...

Of course not. Enough diversity of view and/or material condition to avoid
being fatally stupid and capable of correction is sufficient. All is absurd.

IMHO, your mail fails to meet any means test for utility of content, and
is spectacularly silly as spamage.

Eric