Re: gTLD-MoU Related News (August 19, 1997)

[Jay@Iperdome.com]

At 09:06 PM 8/19/97 -0700, Bryant Durrell wrote:
>Let us not be obtuse.
>
>The fact that four applicants have been *determined* to be qualified 
>doesn't say that much about how many qualified applicants there've
>been overall.  I could have applied today, I could be qualified, and
>there's no way they'd have determined this and put me up on that Web
>page already.
>
>I think four is a touch low, to be honest, but I'm not willing to make
>claims about the meaning of this because the data isn't in yet.  
>Premature claims are just dumb.


Actually, I think four is a touch high, especially 
given the U.S. Government's recently issued *directive*
that clearly states that NO new TLDs shall be added until
the USG has completed its deliberations.

I am actually surprised that you have had any applications
whatsoever!


Regards,

Jay Fenello
President, Iperdome, Inc.  
404-250-3242  http://www.iperdome.com