Re: gTLD-MoU Related News (August 19, 1997)

[Adam Todd <at@ah.net>]

At 17:11 22/08/97 -0400, David W. Maher wrote:
>Message text written by "andi payn"
>>CORE was charged with creating their own MoU that deals with more specific
>issues related to actually functioning as a registrar. The original
>understanding was that registrars would have to sign both MoUs.<
>
>Would it be possible to send this myth to a well deserved perpetual rest?
>There was NEVER any requirement that registrars sign the gTLD-MoU.
>      David Maher (chair, iPOC)
>

The only problem I see with that is the gTLD-MoU sictates what the
Registrars are capable of doing.  

The gTLD-MoU seems to exist in so many modified forms it's unclear as to
what the AGREEMENT between all parties is, besides accepting the name of
the document.

The CORE-MoU need gTLD=MoU to exist, so there has to be a close connection
somewhere.

How can someone sign an agreement to CORE-MoU if they don't agree with
gTLD-MoU? They go hand in hand in my opinion.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet II is the true Human Spirit of Cooperation ... coming soon.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Business Development, Technology Domain Registration and Network Advisory
Adam Todd                                 Personal http://adamtodd.ah.net  
Phone +61 2 9729 0565                     Network  http://www.ah.net
AU Root Server Confederation              http://aursc.ah.net
AU Internet News   mailto:list@ah.net  body "subscribe internet
youremailaddress"