Re: Request for Extension

["Robert T. Nelson" <rnelson@internoc.com>]

On Wed, 27 Aug 1997, Ivan Pope wrote:

> >The purpose of our extension request to NTIA
> >was simply one of fairness.  If the PAB uses
> >the extra time to incorporate responses that
> >address points made in other submissions,
> >then it is only fair that others have a
> >like opportunity to respond.
> 
> PAB was given extra time in order to vote on its submission being an
> official as opposed to individually signed document. It has no intention of
> changing it.

Additionally, PAB rules are such that there is a 2 week comment period,
looking for dissenters. There was insufficient time in between Kevin's
final draft, and submission date. Yes. Kevin could have written faster,
but he does have other things to attend to (clients, wife, silly things
like that). Remember, everyone, we are all volunteering our time in some
way to work these things out. 

Cheers,

Rob Nelson
rnelson@internoc.com