[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Now it's .xxx
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 17:27:00 -0700
- From: Dave Crocker / IMC <dcrocker@imc.org>
- Subject: Re: Now it's .xxx
At 05:22 PM 9/24/97 -0700, andi payn wrote:
>The question I have is whether the reporters came to you for clarification
>or just went ahead with assumptions based on second-hand information? If
>you've attempted to maintain a good relationship with the press, and been
>open to their questions, then we have to blame it on sloppy reporting--which
>is certainly not uncommon nowadays, especially where the Internet is
>concerned.
I had one reporter call me, not from the publication cited for this thread
(and frankly I can't remember which one.) I have not noted any other POC
member indicating that they were called by them, either. Across the
committee, we spend quite a bit of time talking with the press and
certainly try to remain responsive to their queries. Driving along the
old-time information highway of such publications, mileage really DOES vary.
d/
--------------------
Dave Crocker dcrocker@imc.org
Internet Mail Consortium +1 408 246 8253
675 Spruce Dr. fax: +1 408 249 6205
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA info@imc.org, http://www.imc.org
Member, interim Policy Oversight Committee http://www.gtld-mou.org