Re: Truth in Advertising [ACP Style]

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Sascha,

  I am usually pretty good at deciphering poor english and sentance
structure, but I must admit you are definatly a challange.  Maybe
this is one reason that your postings are very difficult to understand
and lead to misreadings.

  Please check your english words a bit closer, and capitilize
the beginning of your sentances as well a punctuate approiatly.

  I can make it through the spelling mistakes ok.  >;)

  Now let me see if I can respond approiatly to your comments below. >;)

Sascha Ignjatovic wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 5 Oct 1997, Jeff Williams wrote:
> 
> >   I agree.  I have posted many suggestions fo resolutions on this
> > very list.  So has Andi, and to a degree Jim DIxon and Jin Flemming.
> > But those in PAB, POC, CORE seem to be blind to any suggestions
> > that don't come from within ans has been made clear from Dave
> > Crocker and Sasha on this list.
> 
> mr.williams
> 
> i am sory you may missunderstud me
> 
> there is a system to bring in some new/aditional ideas/sugestions to the
> internet dns-gtld process
> 
> unfortunately this system dont reqyers all ipoc/poc members to listen
> permanently to the gtld-disscus list where some interesting ideas may come
> from
> 
> so if you like to make your/s voice formaly recognized please be so kind
> and write with your colegues a proposal and submitt it to the poc
> officialy

  Very well.  However, this is a bit disingenious with reguard to this
E-Mail forum as a insterment for doint just that.
> 
> you may also write direct to isoc and iana if you think your proposal is
> not recognized corectly

  That is underway.
> 
> your mails sended to gtld-discuss are also received by the pab members
> but no action or specific discussion were arising out of it at the moment

  Well now, this doesn't suprise me much!  >;)
> 
> the reason may be that your sugestions are not well understud-becouse very
> specific and complicaited for a non techy mind  or you have not chosen the
> right chanel to introduce your/s proposals

  A "non techy" mind as you put it is one of the fundemental problems
with POC/PAB.  More such minds should be represented there, or advisors
to POC/PAB should be sought out by them on those technical issues
that may be presented on this E-Mail forum.  This is, by your own
gTLD-MoU site one of the channels to introduce perposals.
> 
> so again please write your(andy,mr.dixon mr.DuWors mr.jay and many others)
> sugestions in a easy structured and good understandable maner-you can use
> mr.heats testimony to the dns hearing as a reference becouse this was
> very simple explaining the wholle concept of the gtld process as initiated
> by iana and isoc
> 
> http://www.house.gov/science/heath_9-30.html

  This posting is not MR. Heaths complete testamony.  It is his 
written statment entered as PART of his testamony.
> 
> i know it is not so easy to write samthing such complex like your/s
> sugestion  but if you come all together on this isue i am shure you will
> come up with samthing useful

  Thank you.  >;) However I believe I already have.
> 
> please submit this proposal than to the gtld process organisations like
> poc or isoc iana becouse of "political" content of your proposal

  I have not presented any thing that could or should be construed as
"Political" content, to my knowledge.  Just facts.
> 
> please submit your proposal in a positive way and i am shure you will
> achive sam positive feedback

  I believe that I have already.
> 
> thank you very much
> sascha
> ps.one of the problems why your sugestions are not emidiately accepted is
>    as mr.krispin hase mentioned that your identity is not clear to almost
>    all of the people participaiting in the discussion and therefor you are
>    not trusted inaf to them

  I don't believe that you can speek for everyone.  But that is really
besides the point.  That information is readely avalible if requested in
the proper manner.  Please do so and it will be providedor is already
avalible.  I have pointed this out several times befor.
> 
>    maybe some other persons can confirm your identity or you may give
>    us a reason why you hide your identity-it is your right to do so
>    but if you are not taken serious becouse of this  than yoh should
>    descide what is more importend to you  - to be unrecognized or
>    to be truthful and your sugestions respected

  Yes many people can provide that information.  Please provide a
private or secure phone # and it will be done so on a need to know 
basis.  I will also require the same information in kind.  In addition
to a wirtten statment outlining what spicificaly you wish to know
notirized please.
> 
- small snip -

Regards,

-- 
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group. IEG. INC. 
Phone :913-294-2375 (v-office)
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com