Re: (Newbie Query)

[Bob Allisat <bob@wtv.net>]

Jim wrote:
> What they have in mind is a round-robin scheme, but not one 
> where they take the backlog from each at one gulp.  Instead
> 1 from A, then 1 from B, ... one from Z, then one from A, ...

 Don't you all think this whole
 thing getting a little too complex?
 Seems to me an unwieldy structure
 just got unwieldier (SP?). Like
 CORE's losing .WEB, .ART makes an
 unprofitable situation unprofitabler.
 Like no-one on Earth sanctioning
 CORE just making it all the more
 unsanctionable. From worse to more
 worse to ultra-worse. Is there no
 depths these folks will stoop to
 try and hedge the net? Shame! 

 Far be it for me to tell ya'll how
 to run a registry (into the ground).
 But when you all say this is the model
 we should all be ruled by it just
 makes me laugh. Like we all need to
 go bankrupt while at the same time
 attempting to monopolize the Internet.
 Niether likely nor desireable.

 TeleVirtually Yours,

 Bob Allisat

 Director, World TeleVirtual Network             http://www.wtv.net
 PO Box 191 St E Toronto Canada M6H 4E2                 tor@wtv.net
 (416) 534-1999                   http://www.wtv.net/portfolio.html