Re: CORE Show Stopper

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Antony and all,

Antony Van Couvering wrote:
> 
> For Chrissakes Richard, just read the document and stop spreading FUD.  In
> case you're just too lazy, or it gets in the way of your arguments, here
> are the relevant sections from the gTLD-MoU:
> 
> III. STRUCTURE OF THE gTLD-DNS
> SECTION 9. - gTLDs
>    a.Effective upon the entry into force of this MoU, an additional set of
> gTLDs beyond the extant ".com", ".org" and ".net" gTLDs in the DNS shall be
> created by the iPOC [see Section 6(g)] and administered within the
> provisions of this MoU and the CORE-MoU.
>    b.If, in consultation with the PAB and CORE, the POC should later
> determine, that the interests of the users of the Internet would be best
> served by the creation of additional gTLDs within the DNS, beyond those
> created in (a) above, each additional gTLD, if any, shall be created and
> administered within the provisions of this MoU and the CORE-MoU. Each
> additional gTLD created shall consist of a three or greater character
> alphanumeric identifier.
> 
> SECTION 10. - TLDs Not Subject to the Provisions of this MoU
>    a.Pending the expiration or appropriate amendment of the Cooperative
> Agreement under which the ".com", ".org" and ".net" gTLDs are presently
> administered, the ".com", ".org" and ".net" gTLDs shall not be subject to
> the provisions of this MoU.
>    b.Likewise, until the ".com", ".org" and ".net" gTLDs are subject to the
> provisions of this MoU, the registrar which administers those gTLDs shall
> not be considered to be a gTLD Registrar for the purposes of this MoU.
>    c.The two-character top level domain name space within the DNS, which is
> reserved for ISO 3166 country codes under existing accepted Internet RFCs,
> shall not be subject to the provisions of this MoU.
>    d.All other top level domain names which are not explicitly included in
> the set of "generic" top level domains are not subject to the provisions of
> this MoU.
> 
> Now, if you actually have something to say, you can refer to this, which
> apparently you haven't taken the trouble to read.

  Well I have read what you just took from the MoU and CORE-MoU and
found that what Richard essentialy is saying is correct.  Thought
his wording is not a direct quote from the CORE-MoU or the
gTLD-MoU for the pertanant sections that you so kindly provided here,
the meaning of what section 10 and Section 9, are in agreement with
Richards assertion, (See below).
> 

> 
> Antony
> 
> P.S. In case you are confused about 10.d, the domain names which *are*
> "explicitly included in the set of 'generic' top level domains" are .firm,
> .shop, .arts, .rec, .nom, .web, and .info.
> 
> At 04:50 PM 11/30/97 -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> >At 11:43 AM 11/30/97 -0800, Dave Crocker / IMC wrote:
> >de).
> >>
> >>All gTLDs are under the gTLD MoU.
> >
> >We've heard three different things of what IAHC is claiming stewardship of:
> >
> >1) Originally it was all the root.
> >
> >2) At one point it was just over the IAHC tld's
> >
> >3) THe implication in Dave's statement is "the subset of all TLD's that
> >are GTLD's".
> >
> >The latter is rather vague. It would mean "tld's IAHC defines" or "all
> generic
> >TLD's".
> >
> >Is there some sort of resolution on this?
> >--
> >            The right to revolt has sources deep in our history.
> >                -- US Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas
> >
> > richard@sexton.org
> > Tortola, BVI
> >
> >
> >--
> >DOMAIN-POLICY administrivia should be sent to <listserv@lists.internic.net>
> >To unsubscribe send a message with only one line "SIGNOFF DOMAIN-POLICY"
> >For more help regarding Listserv commands send the one line "HELP"
> >
> 

Regards,

-- 
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group. IEG. INC. (Soon to be INEG. INC) Stay tunned! 
Phone :913-294-2375 (v-office)
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com

Wisdom:   "One who knows others is wise,
           one who knows himself is enlightened."
           Lao Tzu