Re: ISPs as stakeholders

[Sascha Ignjatovic <sascha@isoc.vienna.org>]

On Tue, 9 Dec 1997, Jim Dixon wrote:

> *	why should the .COM registry, nearly all of whose registrants 
> 	are in the USA, be transferred out of North America?

there would be inaf us registrars who would register under .com 
if com would becom a part of gtld competence/tition

> *	if the .COM registry is to be moved to another jurisdiction, 
> 	is Switzerland a good choice?

the american .com registrars are under american jurisdiction 
is this so dificult to understand 

the core is not making registration 

the registrars are doing this

so you have to sue your registrar and not the core 

so chose a registrar under your countrys jurisdiction :-)


the swisse/geneva is a very good place becouse there you have 
the world intelectual property organisation and the international trade
mark asociation both and maybe only organisations who may deal with the
global juridical aspects/nature of the internet

we are in process to create a global juridical system and you are 
in process to go back to the old national concepts

what you think is the better way to go for the internet ?

thanks
sascha