Re: ISPs as stakeholders

[Dave Crocker / IMC <dcrocker@imc.org>]

At 05:27 AM 12/10/97 +0000, Jim Dixon wrote:
>In one case the decision would be to move the .com registry from the West
>Coast to the East Coast, to a location much closer to the demographic
>center of the US.  Within the United States there is a more or less 

No, Jim.  It had nothing to do with demographics.  They wanted the staff to
get better access to better quality crabcakes and oysters.

In other words, please stop including irrelevant items.  "Irrelevant" is
defined as having nothing to do with the decision or even with its impact.

>uniform legal system; the cost and difficulty of using that system would

Well, with your continuing demonstration of expertise about important legal
issues, I hope you won't be surprised if I note that you are once again
offering a statement of fact which is so riddled with exceptions and
variations as to be effectively wrong.  And I say that based on enough
personal experience in California, Texas, Delaware and D.C. as to suspect
that an honest to goodness legal professional might have trouble staying in
their seat from laughing so hard at the silliness of your assertion.

>> >*	if the .COM registry is to be moved to another jurisdiction, 
...
>> The basis for choosing Switzerland has been repeatedly and at length.  If

>Notice that Dave simply ignores the question and drops back into his 
>usual personal attack mode.

My, but you do have trouble reading things correctly, sometimes Jim.  I did
not ignore your question.  I said it had been answered previous, repeatedly
and fully.

Try doing some research before raising yet another bogus line of attack, Jim.

d/
--------------------
Dave Crocker                                          dcrocker@imc.org
Internet Mail Consortium                               +1 408 246 8253
675 Spruce Dr.                                    fax: +1 408 249 6205
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA              info@imc.org , http://www.imc.org