[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The $ Requirement of Running a Registry
- Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 09:26:24 EST
- From: CraigSimon@aol.com
- Subject: The $ Requirement of Running a Registry
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out what the smallest commercially viable TLD registry
could be if it complied with the GP's specifications. In other words, would it
need 50,000 registrants, 500,000, or more to make a profit?
Has anyone broken out the prices already?
What follows are the points in the GP. I'm putting in some wild guesses (go
ahead and laugh at them), just as a starting point, but I'm hoping people here
(Jay?) can provide better numbers base on real world experience.
System
1.a 25,000 Hardware providing registrars with FCFS access.
1.b Hardware which 24/7 and scalable
1.c 35,000 Two T1s and related connectivity (yearly)
1.d 5,000 Backup and archive
1.e 5,000 Transaction tracking
1.f Whois
1.g Registrar Port
1.h 50,000 Two zone servers (presuming T1s)
1.x 100,000 (unstated requirements, like staff, promotion, insurance)
Policies
2.a Dispute resolution forum
2.b Failsafe Plan
2.c 200 Staff training
2.d 800 Bulletproofing
Site requirements
3.a 2,000 Power backup
3.b 30,000 24/7 security
3.c 40,000 Redundant site with "hot switchover" capability
Rounding these numbers some more, my estimate implies around $200,000 in
annual operating costs, plus a startup investment of around nearly $100,000.
My guesses are so "out of the blue," I won't try to defend or justify them.
Now let's say the registry charges $10 per entry. This implies sustaining a
level of about 25,000 entries over a period of years in order to expect to
make any money over the long run.
Would anyone care to shoot these numbers down?
Thanks
Craig Simon