Re: 2nd Civil Discourse

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Craig and all,

Craig Simon wrote:

> Jim Fleming wrote:
> > @   The very discussion of an equitable, non-arbitrary, ... way to limit
> > @those who err on the side of using too much bandwidth can expand
> > @recursively to defeat its very purpose.
> > @
> >
> > Are you really trying to conserve bandwidth ?
>
> Perhaps Michael meant bandwidth figuratively, as in the demands on our
> attention.

  Perhaps.  If so than he should have simply stated that.  In that he did not,
I doubt that he meant it figuratively.

>
>
> Why not ask for some efficiency in posting?

  Good idea.  But how does one define "efficiency in posting"?
Your definition of such an idea may be different form some on
any mailing list.

  The other problem that has already occurred too many times is that
when brief posts are used, you get complaints from others that you are not
being specific enough or your point is not well developed.  Dave Crocker
and Perry M were particularly guilty of this on the IAHC and gTLD-discuss
mailing list mor times than I can count.

>
>
> That's the point, isn't it?

  Possibly....

>
>
> yours,
>
> Craig Simon
>
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com