Re: Fenello opens his own kimono

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Dave and all,

Dave Crocker wrote:

> At 12:05 PM 5/26/98 -0400, Jay Fenello wrote:
> >Why are you resisting this level of openness for PAB?
>
> Jay,
>
> It's always fun to watch you bounce around from one minor issue to another,
> trying to find whatever will provide a basis for attacking the MoU.

  I can't of course speak for Jay, but I can speak for our observations over
more than two years now.

  What we have seen is that a constant point and counter point has been
exchanged between you and Jay and a few others rather regularly.  Why?
we do not know or care.  What we do care about is honesty and forthright
admission that the IAHC/MoU process has not been as open as you and most of
the leadership would have many believe.  Jay, is one person that has made
this FACT quite evident.  For that reason alone, I commend Jay.  Good
observation Jay and keep up the good work!

>
>
> Perhaps not surprisingly, these efforts focus on form and structure, rather
> than on content, and they typically turn out to have nothing whatsoever to
> do with anything of substance.

  Our observation would be completely opposite of this contention.  I would
invite all on this list to review that archives of the IAHC-Discuss list (Those
that still remain intact), the gTLD-Discuss list (Again that that remains
intact), and the Domain-Policy list for further evidence to the contrary of
what Dave Crocker and other folks of the leadership of the MoU contend.

>
>
> So to play your little game, I would like to challenge you to live by your
> own rules.

  Maybe Jay won't take up this offer, but I will.  Please advise.

>
>
> Please publish your personal and business tax filings for the last 5 years.

  This request is not relevant and is a misleading request.  We would counter
with:

Please provide us all with evidence that you do not beat your wife, children or
Dog.

>  Please publish the record of your business meetings for the last 2 years.

  This is not really relevant either as it applies to the IAHC/MoU proposal as
Jay is not a signatory and is not involved with the MoU process directly.

>
>
> More importantly, please conduct all of your business online and in public,
> so that we may scrutinize all of your efforts and see whether they are as
> pure as you present them.  It will be particularly interesting to see where
> you get your money from.  The funding for the MoU is well publicized.  You
> willing to play by the same rules?

  FIrst I doubt that Jay's company is in the same game as the MoU.  But that is
for Jay to determine.

  Yes the MoU funding is indeed yet another travesty.  One member of CORE
has already left.  How many more are to follow?  Weather those that still
exist know it or not they were ripped off.

>
>
> Thank you.
>
> d/
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Dave Crocker                Brandenburg Consulting        +1 408 246 8253
> dcrocker@brandenburg.com      675 Spruce Drive        (f) +1 408 273 6464
> www.brandenburg.com        Sunnyvale, CA 94086  USA
>
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com