GTLD-MOU General Discussion List

• Andy Sernovitz, andy@interactivehq.org
• Is IANA fit to lead the Internet Community?, Jul 27, 1997
• RE: Is IANA fit to lead the Internet Community?, Jul 27, 1997
• Who does IANA represent?, Jul 27, 1997
• RE: Is IANA fit to lead the Internet Community?, Jul 27, 1997
• RE: Is IANA fit to lead the Internet Community?, Jul 27, 1997
• RE: Who does IANA represent?, Jul 27, 1997
• RE: Mr. Sernovitz, Jul 28, 1997
• RE: STATEMENT ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES, Jan 23, 1998
• Pre-registration or trademark theft?, Jan 27, 1998
• Angus McKinnon, angus@computerway.com.au
• Re: Free Registration, Jan 14, 1998
• anne (a.r.) philpott, philpott@nortel.ca
• Re: IETF MAILING: REGISTERED ATTENDEES: December 9-13, 1996, Dec 06, 1996
• Antony Van Couvering, avc@netnamesusa.com
• NetNames Policy Statement on new gTLDs, Jun 15, 1997
• RE: Confused, Jun 16, 1997
• Re: Needed Clarification, Jun 17, 1997
• Re: Proposals, Jun 18, 1997
• RE: Warehousing, Jun 19, 1997
• RE: Warehousing, Jun 19, 1997
• Re: Questions, Jun 20, 1997
• Re: (none), Jun 20, 1997
• Paragraph 2f, Jun 20, 1997
• Re: The 60 day publication period., Jun 20, 1997
• Re: Questions, Jun 20, 1997
• Text of and comments on NSI IPO, Jul 06, 1997
• Re: Text of and comments on NSI IPO, Jul 07, 1997
• Re: Question on New gTLDs ..., Jul 09, 1997
• Re: New top level domains for nations (not countries), Jul 11, 1997
• Re: New Domain Names, Jul 26, 1997
• Re: Domain names x Trademarks conflicts - We need a separated ".tm" TLD - Ben02, Jul 26, 1997
• Re: Trademark classification DOES NOT work. Period., Jul 27, 1997
• Re: TradeMarks classification works, and also ".tm" TLD, Jul 27, 1997
• Your July meeting, Jul 27, 1997
• RE: Trademark classification DOES NOT work. Period., Jul 28, 1997
• OIC meeting results?, Jul 28, 1997
• RE: Mr. Sernovitz, Jul 28, 1997
• TEST - KILL THIS, Aug 14, 1997
• Re: Light The Fire, Sep 07, 1997
• ATTENTION flamers, Sep 07, 1997
• PAB official response to DoC, Sep 08, 1997
• Re: The Price Of Admission. Unacceptable., Sep 09, 1997
• Re: gTLD-MoU News (September 13, 1997), Sep 14, 1997
• Re: The Price Of Admission is Acceptable., Sep 14, 1997
• Re: Iperdome Announces World-Wide Visibility, Sep 24, 1997
• Sernovitz attack, Oct 07, 1997
• Re: Sernovitz attack, Oct 07, 1997
• Re: Sernovitz attack, Oct 07, 1997
• Re: Sernovitz attack, Oct 08, 1997
• Re: Nicaraguan history lesson (Re: Sernovitz attack), Oct 08, 1997
• Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31, 1997), Nov 02, 1997
• Re: Who's in charge of Domains?, Nov 08, 1997
• Re: NSI's role in adding new roots, Nov 13, 1997
• Re: registrars ruling the world., Nov 14, 1997
• Re: registrars the big winners?, Nov 14, 1997
• Re: Anti-monopoly Fervor Distorts Interagency DNS Working Group Process*, Nov 15, 1997
• Re: Round Robin style registration? (Newbie), Nov 24, 1997
• ISP/Telecom/NIC Representation in gTLD-MoU, Dec 01, 1997
• Re: Implications of NSI *Skunkworks* Rul ing, Dec 01, 1997
• Re: ISP/Telecom/NIC Representation in gTLD-MoU, Dec 01, 1997
• Re: Put up or shut up, Dec 03, 1997
• Re: Put up or shut up, Dec 03, 1997
• Re: Round Robin, Dec 04, 1997
• Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Dec 18, 1997
• Re: Free Registration, Jan 14, 1998
• RE: STATEMENT ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES, Jan 25, 1998
• Re: List of free Pre-registrars, Jan 27, 1998
• Fwd: monica-lewinsky.com, Jan 29, 1998
• Re: SLD.TLD Portability, Jan 29, 1998
• Nothing for everybody, Jan 30, 1998
• Re: KIS ASS, Feb 02, 1998
• Re: "Internet Names *and* Addresses", Feb 17, 1998
• Re: Are There Other TLD Lists?, May 22, 1998
• Re: anti-mou people, May 22, 1998
• The Domain Ouroboros, Jun 07, 1998
• Arminda Dimayuga, arminda@hotmail.com
• registrar charging $30,000 for "platinum" pre-registration, Nov 06, 1997
• asd31, asd31@ix.netcom.com
• No Subject, Nov 14, 1997
• Autumn Rochelle Geis, arg201@is5.nyu.edu
• No Subject, Feb 08, 1998
• Aveek Datta, MoNoLiTH+@CMU.EDU
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: First come/First served, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: First come/First served, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: First come/First served, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: Where are we going?, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: Where are we going?, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: FCFS, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: First come/First served, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: First come/First served, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Regestry Identifiers, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Shared data base access by registries, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: First come/First served, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: International Registries, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Shared TLD's? Dead Idea. (Re: newdom BOF), Nov 19, 1996
• Re: First come/First served, Nov 19, 1996
• Street Addresses, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: free.nic (was_Re: First come/First served), Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Shared domains, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Shared domains, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Shared domains, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Shared domains, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: No Representation! (Re: IAHC 'business' composition), Nov 19, 1996
• Registry Acceptance, was Re: Shared domains, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Nov 20, 1996
• Questions for all those using prior-use arguments, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Shared TLD's? Dead Idea. (Re: newdom BOF), Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Am I confused?, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Shared data base access by registries, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Shared data base access by registries, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: PRIOR USE (Re: Am I confused?), Nov 20, 1996
• Re: PRIOR USE (Re: Am I confused?), Nov 20, 1996
• Internet Community, Nov 20, 1996
• Registry requirements?, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Your website, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Fw: Re: Shared domains, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: The end of DNS as we know it, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: "Acceptance" of money, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Fw: Re: Shared domains, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: FreeNIC,AlterNIC,InterNIC,AnyNIC: ALL EQUAL (Re: Hijacked Domain Names?), Nov 21, 1996
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Nov 21, 1996
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Nov 21, 1996
• Re: Regestry Implementation, Nov 22, 1996
• Re: Disposition of the TLD applications made to the IANA, Nov 22, 1996
• Just a thought, Nov 22, 1996
• Re: Disposition of the TLD applications made to the IANA, Nov 22, 1996
• Re: Just a thought, Nov 22, 1996
• Why does everyone assume that a registry must be like the Internic?, Nov 23, 1996
• Re: Why does everyone assume that a registry must be like the Internic?, Nov 23, 1996
• Re: Hijacked Domain Names?, Nov 23, 1996
• Re: Why does everyone assume that a registry must be like the Internic?, Nov 24, 1996
• Proposals, Dec 03, 1996
• Re: Expansion of the IAHC, Dec 04, 1996
• Commercialism, was Re: Okay, I'm "sorry", Dec 05, 1996
• Re: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries !!!, Dec 06, 1996
• Re: The IANA's File of iTLD Requests, Dec 06, 1996
• Re: Your cards..., Dec 06, 1996
• Re: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries !!!, Dec 06, 1996
• .COM TLD, DNS and the English Language, Dec 10, 1996
• Re: .COM TLD, DNS and the English Language, Dec 10, 1996
• Re: how to solve TM collision, Dec 11, 1996
• Re: Int'l diversity in iTLD Registries, Dec 11, 1996
• Re: Int'l diversity in iTLD Registries, Dec 12, 1996
• Re: how to solve TM collision, Dec 12, 1996
• Re: Responses to Responses, Dec 13, 1996
• Re: Please make other top level domains available, SOON!, Dec 13, 1996
• Re: Directory Services A Great Help, Dec 13, 1996
• Re: DNS and Directory Services, Dec 14, 1996
• Re: DNS and Directory Services, Dec 15, 1996
• Re: DNS and Directory Services, Dec 16, 1996
• Re: Offense Domain Names, was Re: who decides? (was: trademark categories), Dec 16, 1996
• Re: Root Name Servers in Sync ?, Dec 17, 1996
• Re: Alternic, Dec 17, 1996
• No Subject, Dec 20, 1996
• Re: Lottery, Dec 20, 1996
• Registry Distribution, Dec 21, 1996
• Re: Problems with section 5, Dec 22, 1996
• Web Pages reverted?, Dec 22, 1996
• Re: The view from my window, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: The view from my window, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: FCFS and prior use, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: The view from my window, Dec 23, 1996
• FCFS: Clarification, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: CORE, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: Thread 1: Sharing, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: Fees, Dec 29, 1996
• Re: Royalty Based Fees, Dec 29, 1996
• Re: Hypothesis -- Mr. Jeff Williams is a Teenager., Dec 29, 1996
• Re: An Open Letter to the IAHC, Dec 29, 1996
• Re: IGTECH's proposal: a gTLD for individual users, Jan 04, 1997
• Re: An argument against Shared TLDs, Jan 10, 1997
• Q: Generic "Specific" TLDs, Jan 11, 1997
• Re: Panavision, domain names and trademarks, Jan 15, 1997
• Re: Panavision, domain names and trademarks, Jan 15, 1997
• Re: Long domain names got you down? Here's the solution., Jan 16, 1997
• Re: Network Solutions' Response to IAHC Draft, Jan 16, 1997
• Re: TLD's and Jon Postel's original draft (150TLDs/50 registries)., Jan 17, 1997
• Re: An alternative to the lottery, Jan 17, 1997
• Re: TLD's and Jon Postel's original draft (150TLDs/50 registries)., Jan 17, 1997
• Re: An alternative to the lottery, Jan 17, 1997
• Proposal Two: Sample Meta Registrar, Jan 18, 1997
• Proposal One: Class B TLDs, Jan 18, 1997
• Re: Proposal Two: Sample Meta Registrar, Jan 20, 1997
• Send your comments to IAHC-Submit!, Jan 20, 1997
• Re: Proposal Two: Sample Meta Registrar, Jan 20, 1997
• Re: What seven TLDs?, Jan 20, 1997
• Re: Proposal Two: Sample Meta Registrar, Jan 20, 1997
• So how's the final proposal going, IAHC?, Jan 21, 1997
• NUM.NET and the NUM TLD, Jan 21, 1997
• Re: NUM.NET and the NUM TLD, Jan 22, 1997
• Re: NSI, Jan 22, 1997
• Re: Possible new gTLD names..., Jan 23, 1997
• Re: Possible new gTLD names..., Jan 23, 1997
• Re: Plan Ahead - Think Big !, Jan 23, 1997
• Re: About the personnal domains, Jan 24, 1997
• Re: About the personnal domains, Jan 24, 1997
• Re: What new TLDs and how many?, Jan 26, 1997
• Re: New lawsuit decision, Jan 28, 1997
• Axel H. Horns, Horns@t-online.de
• (Fwd) Use of Repository Data for Certain Purposes, Jan 11, 1997
• Use of Repository Data for Certain Purposes, Jan 11, 1997
• Use of Repository Data for Certain Purposes, Jan 11, 1997
• Re: Use of Repository Data for Certain Purposes, Jan 14, 1997
• Re: Availability of aggregate repository data, Jan 15, 1997
• Re: comments on the draft specifications for administration and, Jan 16, 1997
• (Fwd) The Canadian solution to domain name disputes, Jan 16, 1997
• Re: The Canadian solution to domain name disputes, Jan 16, 1997
• Certain Decisions made by gTLD Registrars, Jan 17, 1997
• Barry, barryg@hway.net
• Review Article, Dec 03, 1997
• Barry Jeynes, Barry.Jeynes@Swift.Com
• RE: Personal Feuds, Jan 20, 1998
• Barry Shein, bzs@world.std.com
• Re: We need a separated ".tm" Yes Yes Finally, Jul 25, 1997
• Re: We need a separated ".tm" Yes Yes Finally, Jul 25, 1997
• Re: We need a separated ".tm" Yes Yes Finally, Jul 25, 1997
• Re: We need a separated ".tm" Yes Yes Finally, Jul 26, 1997
• Re: We need a separated ".tm" Yes Yes Finally, Jul 27, 1997
• Re: Domain names x Trademarks conflicts - We need a separated ".tm" TLD - Ben02, Jul 27, 1997
• Re: Domain Names are like new Trademark classes, separated class for each TLD, Jul 28, 1997
• Re: gTLD-MoU Related News (August 19, 1997), Aug 20, 1997
• Ben Isaacson, ben@interactivehq.org
• STATEMENT ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES, Jan 23, 1998
• Benjamin, Benjamin@Opiniao.com
• Re: RFC? IETF? What's That? (Was_Fwd: Re: The opening up of ., Jan 23, 1998
• Benjamin Azevedo, benjamin@nome.com
• Introducing myself prior to contribution, Jul 24, 1997
• Waiting for Santa Claus? Privatize TLD's but *CHARGE* for it ! Ben/01, Jul 24, 1997
• Waiting for Santa Claus? Privatize TLD's but *CHARGE* for it ! Ben/01Sum, Jul 24, 1997
• Waiting for Santa Claus? Privatize TLD's but *CHARGE* registrars for it !, Jul 24, 1997
• Domain names x Trademarks conflicts - We need a separated ".tm" TLD - Ben02, Jul 25, 1997
• Re: Waiting for Santa Claus? Privatize TLD's but *CHARGE* registrars for it !, Jul 25, 1997
• Re: Domain names x Trademarks conflicts - We need a separated ".tm" TLD - Ben02, Jul 25, 1997
• Re: We need a separated ".tm" Yes Yes Finally, Jul 25, 1997
• Re: We need a separated ".tm" Yes Yes Finally, Jul 25, 1997
• Re: Domain names x Trademarks conflicts - We need a separated..., Jul 25, 1997
• tm TLD in resume - Keep dispute low, Jul 25, 1997
• Re: Waiting for Santa Claus? Privatize TLD's but *CHARGE* registrars for it !, Jul 25, 1997
• Re: Domain names x Trademarks conflicts - We need a separated..., Jul 25, 1997
• Multiple addressing - The upcoming use of Virtual Website addressing - Ben03, Jul 25, 1997
• Re: Domain names x Trademarks conflicts - We need a separated ".tm" TLD, Jul 26, 1997
• TradeMarks classification works, and also ".tm" TLD, Jul 27, 1997
• Domain Names are like new Trademark classes, separated class for each TLD, Jul 27, 1997
• Re: TradeMarks classification works, and also ".tm" TLD, Jul 27, 1997
• [Fwd: Re: TradeMarks classification works, and also ".tm" TLD], Jul 27, 1997
• [Fwd: Re: Hudson & Associates "Hudson's Solution" RE. tm.x], Jul 27, 1997
• Please correct a missing NOT on previos email, Jul 27, 1997
• TradeMarks classification works, and also ".tm" TLD, Jul 27, 1997
• Free Market on fresh new TLD business, Jul 27, 1997
• Re: Trademark classification DOES NOT work. Period., Jul 28, 1997
• Re: Trademark classification DOES NOT work. Period., Jul 29, 1997
• sTLD (was Re: ---- ), Sep 19, 1997
• Benjamin_Azevedo, Benjamin_Azevedo@ibm.net
• Re: registrar charging $30,000 for "platinum" pre-registration, Nov 13, 1997
• Re: registrars the big winners? Maybe Internet infrastructure , instead, Nov 14, 1997
• Re: A Clear Future: How to define new TLD's ?, Nov 14, 1997
• Bernhard Rother, BRother@eurotel.de
• unsubscribe, Mar 04, 1998
• Betty Schafer, betty.schafer@dir.org
• IAHC's mixed playground., Jan 06, 1997
• Resolving trademark/domain name issue?, Jan 08, 1997
• 60 days - Solving Trademark/Domain Name conflict., Jan 09, 1997
• Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?, Jan 09, 1997
• CORRECTION - Re: [INTA] Trademarks and Domain Names, Jan 10, 1997
• Bijan Koch, bkoch@telemation.de
• Re: Judge Defers AlterNIC Action, Jul 25, 1997
• Bill Crews, bill@crewsalt.net
• Re: Personal Feuds, Jan 20, 1998
• Bill Farina, billf@terracom.net
• RE: Are There Other TLD Lists?, May 21, 1998
• Bill Manning, bmanning@ISI.EDU
• Re: Where are we going, and root servers?, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Expansion of the IAHC, Dec 04, 1996
• Re: Expansion of the IAHC, Dec 04, 1996
• Re: foreign languages, Dec 07, 1996
• eager children, Dec 13, 1996
• Re: DNS and Directory Services, Dec 14, 1996
• Re: DNS and Directory Services, Dec 15, 1996
• Re: Is stuttering the price to pay?, Dec 28, 1996
• Re: understanding consensus, Dec 29, 1996
• Re: An Open Letter to the IAHC, Dec 29, 1996
• Re: Commercial Endeavor, Dec 30, 1996
• Re: understanding consensus, Dec 30, 1996
• use the force Luke..., Jan 01, 1997
• Re: use the force Luke..., Jan 01, 1997
• Re: use the lukewarm farce..., Jan 01, 1997
• Re: .africa gTLD, Jan 24, 1997
• Bill Semich, bsemich@new-york.org
• Info on NSI'srecent DNS system failure, Jul 18, 1997
• Something's Gone Missing (WAS Re: A Preview - Iperdomes Response to the NOI), Aug 15, 1997
• Re: A Preview - Iperdomes Response to the NOI, Aug 15, 1997
• Bill Walker, wawsr@tiac.net
• Re: KIS ASS, Feb 09, 1998
• Birgit, Birgit@spray.no
• No Subject, Feb 23, 1998
• bmanning, bmanning@ISI.EDU
• Re: "int" domain, Nov 21, 1996
• Re: "int" domain, Nov 21, 1996
• Re: What happens in 1998?, Dec 05, 1996
• Re: DNS and Directory Services, Dec 14, 1996
• Re: DNS and Directory Services, Dec 16, 1996
• Re: Free Web Space and Authoring for Historical Societies, Dec 17, 1996
• Re: con men, Dec 17, 1996
• Re: DNS and Directory Services, Dec 17, 1996
• Re: con men, Dec 17, 1996
• Re: con men, Dec 17, 1996
• Re: Fast Food Analogy, Jan 02, 1997
• Re: Anti Capitalism?, Jan 03, 1997
• Bob, tor@wtv.net
• Re: Why does everyone assume that a registry must be like the Internic?, Nov 24, 1996
• Re: SAIC BUYS BELLCORE, Nov 25, 1996
• Re: AGN-DNS EARTH/USA RegistryTerms and Conditions FIRST DRAFT, Nov 27, 1996
• RE: AGN-DNS EARTH/USA RegistryTerms and Conditions FIRST DRAFT, Nov 28, 1996
• Bob Allisat, tor@wtv.net
• IAHC: Hot Potatoe, Nov 16, 1996
• Re: Let the games begin, Nov 17, 1996
• Re: Let the games begin, Nov 17, 1996
• Re: Let the games begin, Nov 17, 1996
• IAHC: Exclusionary Process (Was-Re: Let the games begin), Nov 17, 1996
• International Internet Commission, Nov 17, 1996
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: First come/First served, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: Where are we going?, Nov 18, 1996