GTLD-MOU General Discussion List

• Bob Allisat, bob@wtv.net
• Re: Free Registration, Jan 14, 1998
• http://www.wtv.net/allisat (Was_Re: NSI's contract), Jan 14, 1998
• Re: NSI's contract, Jan 14, 1998
• Re: NSI's contract, Jan 14, 1998
• Re: Free Registration, Jan 14, 1998
• Re: Free Registration, Jan 14, 1998
• Re: NSI's contract, Jan 14, 1998
• Re: Free Registration, Jan 14, 1998
• A Critical Crossroads, Jan 15, 1998
• Re: Clinton Domain Name Plan Nears Completion, Jan 16, 1998
• Re: Personal Feuds, Jan 16, 1998
• .FCN alpha Domain Name Registry, Jan 20, 1998
• A CALL TO DNR! http://www.fcn.net/xindex.html http://www.fcn.net/xindex.html, Jan 22, 1998
• DON'T TREAD ON US..., Jan 22, 1998
• NIKE.BLOWS, DISNEY.SUCKS, MACDONALDS.MADCOW, Jan 22, 1998
• CORE: Gone Mad Take Over THE WORLD DNRmaniacs!, Jan 22, 1998
• Trademarks are here to stay (was:Re: NIKE.BLOWS, DISNEY.SUCKS....), Jan 22, 1998
• RFC? IETF? What's That? (Was_Fwd: Re: The opening up of .com), Jan 23, 1998
• "the great CORE meeting in Washington", Jan 23, 1998
• Re: RFC? IETF? What's That? (Was_Fwd: Re: The opening up of .com), Jan 23, 1998
• Re:RFC? IETF? What's That?, Jan 23, 1998
• Re: "the great CORE meeting in Washington", Jan 24, 1998
• Re: STATEMENT ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES, Jan 24, 1998
• CORE: Snake Oil Hucksters, Jan 24, 1998
• Re: Last word on preregistration (was:Re: STATEMENT ON INTERNETDOMAIN NAMES), Jan 24, 1998
• Re: CORE: Snake Oil Hucksters, Jan 24, 1998
• Re: Trademarks are here to stay, Jan 24, 1998
• Re: Four to One, Jan 24, 1998
• Re:Despite Disaster Zealots Continue to Convert The Unseuspecting, Jan 25, 1998
• RE: STATEMENT ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES, Jan 25, 1998
• Re: List of free Pre-registrars, Jan 26, 1998
• FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: THE LIMIT TO TRADEMARKS, Jan 27, 1998
• IETF BOF: LA, March 98, Jan 27, 1998
• Re: RFC? IETF? What's That?, Jan 28, 1998
• How Many TLDs? 30,000! (Was_Re: RFC? IETF? What's That?), Jan 28, 1998
• Re: How Many TLDs? 30,000! (Was_Re: RFC? IETF? What's That?), Jan 28, 1998
• Re: FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: THE LIMIT TO TRADEMARKS, Jan 28, 1998
• Re: How Many TLDs? 30,000! (Was_Re: RFC? IETF? What's That?), Jan 28, 1998
• Re: How Many TLDs? 30,000! (Was_Re: RFC? IETF? What's That?), Jan 28, 1998
• Re: How Many TLDs? 30,000! (Was_Re: RFC? IETF? What's That?), Jan 28, 1998
• Re: How Many TLDs? 30,000! (Was_Re: RFC? IETF? What's That?), Jan 29, 1998
• Re: Iperdome Press Release, Jan 29, 1998
• Re: firestorm, Jan 29, 1998
• Re: How Many TLDs? 30,000! (Was_Re: RFC? IETF? What's That?), Jan 29, 1998
• Re: .wtv for Allisat?, Jan 29, 1998
• Re: FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: THE LIMIT TO TRADEMARKS, Jan 29, 1998
• Back to the drawing board, Jan 29, 1998
• Re: firestorm, Jan 29, 1998
• Profit? Not in Domain Name Registration!, Jan 29, 1998
• Re: How Many TLDs? 30,000! (Was_Re: RFC? IETF? What's That?), Jan 30, 1998
• Four Minor Internet Clubs Support Anti-trust monopoly over NewDomains, Restricting Registration System, and Hiding Jon Postel/IANA adISOC behind Swiss law to boot! Over our dead, dismembered and otherwisemutilated bodies!, Jan 30, 1998
• Re- firestorm, Jan 30, 1998
• Re: .wtv for Allisat?, Jan 30, 1998
• Re: .wtv for Allisat?, Jan 30, 1998
• Re: UK Registrars URGENT meeting, Jan 31, 1998
• New Top Level Domain BOF@IETF-LA'98, Jan 31, 1998
• Re: When Will the New GTLDs Come Into Effect?, Jan 31, 1998
• On Internet Governance: An Independent Blue Paper., Jan 31, 1998
• Re: IETF BOF: LA, March 98, Feb 01, 1998
• Re: Splitting the net, Feb 01, 1998
• Re: KIS ASS, Feb 02, 1998
• Re: KIS ASS, Feb 02, 1998
• Re: KIS ASS, Feb 02, 1998
• Postel: Right Wing DNS Terrorist, Feb 04, 1998
• Internet: The Founding Convention, Feb 04, 1998
• altRFC: http://www.fcn.net/altrfc.html, Feb 04, 1998
• HOT! HOT! HOT! http://www.fcn.net/xxx, Feb 05, 1998
• Re: Representation on PAB, Feb 05, 1998
• Re: Representation on PAB, Feb 05, 1998
• Re: Representation on PAB, Feb 06, 1998
• http://www.fcn.net/xxx/, Feb 06, 1998
• ACRONYMANIACS!, Feb 06, 1998
• EVEN HOTTER: http://www.fcn.net/xxx/ (correction!), Feb 06, 1998
• Postel & Kashpureff: Frick and Frack, Feb 06, 1998
• Re: Postel & Kashpureff: Frick and Frack, Feb 06, 1998
• The Cyber-banana Republic of The Internet, Feb 06, 1998
• Netizen's Message, Feb 09, 1998
• Re: Re[2]: KIS ASS, Feb 09, 1998
• Re: KIS ASS, Feb 09, 1998
• Re: KIS ASS, Feb 09, 1998
• Re: KIS ASS, Feb 09, 1998
• Re: Netizen's Message, Feb 09, 1998
• Re: Netizen's Message, Feb 09, 1998
• Postel: Insurrection Inc., Feb 12, 1998
• RE: CORE == Big Brother ??, Feb 12, 1998
• Re: CORE == Big Brother ??, Feb 12, 1998
• RE: CORE == Big Brother ??, Feb 12, 1998
• RE: CORE == Big Brother ??, Feb 12, 1998
• Re: CORE == Big Brother ??, Feb 12, 1998
• ITAG: Not Another One!, Feb 13, 1998
• Re: ITAG: Not Another One!, Feb 13, 1998
• Re: ITAG: Not Another One!, Feb 13, 1998
• Re: CORE == Big Brother ??, Feb 13, 1998
• Re: Ten thousand new LTDs ???, Feb 13, 1998
• Re: Ten thousand new LTDs ???, Feb 13, 1998
• Re: Ten thousand new LTDs ???, Feb 14, 1998
• Renegade Dictators: IETF/IANA/ISOC/ETC, Feb 14, 1998
• Re: ETSI vs. Magaziner whose interests? (was) RE: CORE == BigBrother ??, Feb 14, 1998
• Questions for Crispin, Feb 14, 1998
• "We The People", Feb 14, 1998
• Re: Questions for Crispin, Feb 14, 1998
• Re: whose interests?, Feb 14, 1998
• Re: ETSI vs. Magaziner whose interests? (was) RE: CORE == BigBrother ??, Feb 14, 1998
• Re: ETSI vs. Magaziner whose interests? (my LAST on this), Feb 15, 1998
• Re: whose interests?, Feb 15, 1998
• "Nooobody Expects The Spanish Inquisition!", Feb 15, 1998
• healthy further evolution?, Feb 15, 1998
• FINAL WORDS: ON .WTV & .FCN, Feb 15, 1998
• Re: whose interests?, Feb 17, 1998
• (fwd) BREAK-IN AT THE SRS, Feb 18, 1998
• RE: The ITU Bogeyman, Feb 23, 1998
• "National" Registries, Feb 25, 1998
• Re: ITAG: Not Another One!, Feb 27, 1998
• Internet Governance: A US Internal Matter., Mar 03, 1998
• Re: Internet Governance: A US Internal Matter., Mar 04, 1998
• CORE Nonsense, May 22, 1998
• Re: anti-mou people, May 22, 1998
• Internet Governance & "Producers' Cooperatives", May 26, 1998
• Re: Internet Governance & "Producers' Cooperatives", May 27, 1998
• "U.S. hopes new Internet plan will appease critics", May 27, 1998
• Re: Internet Governance & "Producers' Cooperatives", May 28, 1998
• Internet Government is *not* IANA, May 29, 1998
• Re: Internet Governance & "Producers' Cooperatives", May 30, 1998
• Open Process: Towards IANA II, Jun 11, 1998
• FYI: "Private Sector Will Take Up Domain Plan", Jun 12, 1998
• Pull together or pull apart, Jun 12, 1998
• Re: PAB Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?, Jun 12, 1998
• Internet Government (was_Re: Questions for Stakeholders), Jun 13, 1998
• Unbiased Neutral Forum, Jun 15, 1998
• Re: Internet Government (was_Re: Questions for Stakeholders), Jun 15, 1998
• Re: Unbiased Neutral Forum, Jun 15, 1998
• Re: Internet Government (was_Re: Questions for Stakeholders), Jun 16, 1998
• Re: Farber on self-governance, Jun 17, 1998
• Re: Farber on self-governance, Jun 17, 1998
• FCN.NET, ML.ORG, EU,ORG: Free DNR, Jun 18, 1998
• POSTEL: ANSWER THE QUESTIONS!, Jun 18, 1998
• Re: FCN.NET, ML.ORG, EU,ORG: Free DNR, Jun 18, 1998
• (fwd) .US domain managed by the Post office?, Jun 19, 1998
• Re: POSTEL: ANSWER THE QUESTIONS!, Jun 23, 1998
• IFWP Juy 1-2 Proposed Agenda, Jun 24, 1998
• IFWP Juy 1-2 Procedural Proposal, Jun 24, 1998
• Delusion is an illness, Oct 29, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Jeff Williams' FAQ (was Re: About Bind..., Nov 14, 1998
• Bob Helfant, bhelfant@globecomm.net
• Re: Please make other top level domains available, SOON!, Dec 13, 1996
• Re: understanding consensus, Dec 27, 1996
• Re: understanding consensus, Dec 27, 1996
• Re: A position paper, Dec 30, 1996
• Re: Fees, Dec 30, 1996
• Re: Thread 5: Defining the namespace (was Re: Thread 1: Sharing), Dec 31, 1996
• Re: Fees, Dec 31, 1996
• Re: Fast Food Analogy, Jan 02, 1997
• Re: Fees, Jan 02, 1997
• Re: Is shared generally agreed, then?, Jan 06, 1997
• Re: Is shared generally agreed...NO!, Jan 09, 1997
• Re: Is shared generally agreed...NO!, Jan 10, 1997
• Re: Confused, Jun 16, 1997
• Re: Warehousing, Jun 19, 1997
• Re: Questions, Jun 20, 1997
• Re: (none), Jun 20, 1997
• Re: Questions, Jun 20, 1997
• Re: CORE vs. InterNIC, Jun 20, 1997
• Re: CORE vs. InterNIC, Jun 20, 1997
• Re: Registrars vs. Registrants, Jun 20, 1997
• Re: CORE vs. InterNIC, Jun 20, 1997
• Re: Question on New gTLDs ..., Jul 10, 1997
• Re: Update on gTLD Registrar Application Process, Jul 15, 1997
• Re: Reasoned debate requires reasonable statements, Jul 29, 1997
• Re: Warehousing, TM violations & the new gTLD's, Aug 14, 1997
• Re: Warehousing, TM violations & the new gTLD's, Aug 15, 1997
• Re: Warehousing, TM violations & the new gTLD's, Aug 20, 1997
• Re: The Price Of Admission is Acceptable., Sep 15, 1997
• Re: The Price Of Admission is Acceptable., Sep 15, 1997
• Re: registrar charging $30,000 for "platinum" pre-registration, Nov 07, 1997
• Re: War of Internet Governance: 1995 - ????, Nov 11, 1997
• Re: A Serious Question..., Nov 13, 1997
• Re: THE WORLD'S WORST KEPT SECRET: USG dumps CORE, Dec 18, 1997
• Re: POC: Delaware, USA Inc.?, Jan 08, 1998
• Re: POC: Delaware, USA Inc.?, Jan 12, 1998
• Re: Personal Feuds, Jan 20, 1998
• Re: The "Statement of Principles", Jun 01, 1998
• Re: The "Statement of Principles", Jun 02, 1998
• Re: PAB Re: The "Statement of Principles", Jun 02, 1998
• Bob Henley, bob.henley@inka.co.uk
• Fw: remove, Dec 18, 1996
• Bob Racko, bobr@dprc.net
• Re: [ GIG-TALK ] Tiered DNS Democracy, Oct 19, 1997
• Brad Templeton, brad@alto.clari.net
• Trademarks, random strings, sharing, reserved words, Dec 21, 1996
• The criteria for a good naming system, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: Trademarks, random strings, sharing, reserved words, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: Trademarks, random strings, sharing, reserved words, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Trademarks, random strings, sharing, reserved words, Dec 28, 1996
• Re: An alternative to the lottery, Jan 17, 1997
• Brandon T. Martin, brandon@apollo.blizzard.net
• Re: Eugene got what he deserved, Jul 24, 1997
• Brendan Bouffler, brendan@sighup.net
• Re: Welcome to gtld-discuss, Apr 18, 1999
• Re: [Oz-ISP] Action over the Bill (fwd), Apr 22, 1999
• Brent, brent@ime.net
• Fw: American Registry for Internet Numbers (fwd), Jan 19, 1997
• Brian Carpenter CERN-CN, brian@dxcoms.cern.ch
• Re: un backing itu iahc etc . etc., Nov 18, 1996
• Brian E Carpenter, brian@hursley.ibm.com
• Factual Correction Re: Unbiased Neutral Forum, Jun 16, 1998
• Brian Pollack, brian@primenet.com
• Revised Draft Comments, Dec 24, 1996
• Brock A. Poling, bpoling@mc2-csr.com
• Proposals, Jun 18, 1997
• RE: Warehousing, Jun 19, 1997
• (none), Jun 20, 1997
• Brock Poling, bpoling@mc2-csr.com
• unsubscribe gtld-discuss, Feb 06, 1998
• Bruce Balden, balden@mail.bc.rogers.wave.ca
• .COM mostly in North America?, Dec 15, 1997
• Re: Re:.com should remain 'geographically central' toNorthAmerica?, Dec 17, 1997
• Re: AlterNIC cofounder ready for trial, Dec 31, 1997
• Re: DNS: Does CORE stand for an open or for a closed Internet?, Jan 09, 1998
• Bryant Durrell, durrell@innocence.com
• Re: New proposal from Ronald J. Fitzherbert, Dec 02, 1996
• Re: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries !!!, Dec 05, 1996
• Re: Your cards..., Dec 05, 1996
• Re: 60 day waiting peroid., Dec 20, 1996
• Re: registries and lotteries, Dec 20, 1996
• Re: Congradulations, Dec 22, 1996
• Re: FCFS and prior use, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: The view from my window, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Thread 2: 60-day issue, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: The truth of the matter, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Thread 3: selection of registrars, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Thread 2: 60-day issue, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: An observation, Dec 26, 1996
• Re: Thread 3: selection of registrars, Dec 26, 1996
• Re: understanding consensus, Dec 27, 1996
• Re: Thread 5: Defining the namespace (was Re: Thread 1:, Dec 29, 1996
• Re: An observation, Dec 31, 1996
• Re: elvis@graceland.com: Re: Postel's Draft, Jan 02, 1997
• Re: Updated draft befor final?, Jan 09, 1997
• Re: Timelines, Jan 10, 1997
• Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else), Jan 14, 1997
• Re: The dice are thrown, Jan 21, 1997
• Re: NSI, Jan 22, 1997
• Re: Possible new gTLD names..., Jan 22, 1997
• Re: [Fwd: two new root only servers], Jan 23, 1997
• Re: What new TLDs and how many?, Jan 25, 1997
• Re: Re : .africa gTLD, Jan 27, 1997
• Re: gTLD-MoU Related News (August 19, 1997), Aug 19, 1997
• Re: gTLD-MoU Related News (August 19, 1997), Aug 19, 1997
• Re: gTLD-MoU Related News (August 19, 1997), Aug 20, 1997
• bzhang, bzhang@sun.midwest.co.cn
• RE: Trademark classification DOES NOT work. Period., Jul 28, 1997
• Re: Trademark classification DOES NOT work. Period., Jul 28, 1997
• C C Magnus Gustavsson, mag@lysator.liu.se
• Re:.com should remain 'geographically central' to NorthAmerica?, Dec 16, 1997
• Re: "Internet Names *and* Addresses", Feb 18, 1998
• Re: "Internet Names *and* Addresses", Feb 19, 1998
• Re: TLD .sex dismay or resistance, Apr 19, 1999
• Re: TLD .sex dismay or resistance, Apr 19, 1999
• Calvin Browne, calvin@inlaw.improtech.co.za
• Re: Dispute resolution, Dec 22, 1996
• Re: Dispute resolution, Dec 23, 1996
• Choosing gTLD Registrars, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Thread 3: selection of registrars, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: Registration of Common Names, Dec 27, 1996
• Re: Notes (fwd), Jan 02, 1997
• Camillo Pasquariello, Camillo.Pasquariello@mci2000.com
• re: Renegade Dictators: IETF/IANA/ISOC/ETC, Feb 15, 1998
• ISOC/IETF *ARE* International Bodies[was: PAB nIANA facts], Jun 09, 1998
• Re: ISOC/IETF *ARE* International Bodies[was: PAB nIANA facts], Jun 10, 1998
• Carl Malamud [IMS], carl@media.org
• Re: tpc.int is no fraud, Dec 12, 1996
• Re: tpc.int is no fraud, Dec 16, 1996
• Re: Internet Governance: A US Internal Matter., Mar 03, 1998
• Carl Oppedahl, carl@oppedahl.com
• Re: Framework for IAHC proposals, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: TLD assignment permanence, Nov 24, 1996
• Re: Randomly-assigned TLDs, Nov 24, 1996
• Suggested reading for IAHC participants and commenters, Nov 24, 1996
• Re: New proposal from Ronald J. Fitzherbert, Nov 24, 1996
• Re: Avoiding Lawsuits, Nov 25, 1996
• Re: New proposal from Simon Higgs, Nov 25, 1996
• Re: The user viewpoint, Dec 05, 1996
• Re: What happens in 1998?, Dec 05, 1996
• Re: Random domain names, Dec 06, 1996
• Re: .COM TLD, DNS and the English Language, Dec 10, 1996
• Re: how to solve TM collision, Dec 11, 1996
• Re: .COM TLD, DNS and the English Language, Dec 11, 1996
• NSI's handling of COM panned in ABA magazine, Dec 11, 1996
• NSI's handling of COM discussed in FCBA magazine, Dec 11, 1996
• Re: trademark law, Dec 12, 1996
• Re: trademark law, Dec 13, 1996
• Re: Roadrunner v. NSI, Dec 13, 1996
• Re: Shared and open tlds, Dec 14, 1996
• Re: Shared and open tlds, Dec 14, 1996
• Re: Shared and open tlds, Dec 15, 1996
• Re: Who decides? (was: trademark categories), Dec 16, 1996
• Adding two letters and a dot renders unoffensive?, Dec 16, 1996
• Re: Adding two letters and a dot renders unoffensive?, Dec 16, 1996
• Re: Who decides? (was: trademark categories), Dec 16, 1996
• Re: Who decides? (was: trademark categories), Dec 16, 1996
• Re: Who decides? (was: trademark categories), Dec 16, 1996
• Re: Shared and open tlds, Dec 16, 1996
• Re: Adding two letters and a dot renders unoffensive?, Dec 16, 1996
• two letters at the end defines "where you are going"?, Dec 18, 1996
• Re: Adding two letters and a dot renders unoffensive?, Dec 18, 1996
• Article in Government Lawyer about NSI's domain name policy, Dec 18, 1996
• Re: two letters at the end defines "where you are going"?, Dec 19, 1996
• Geographically delimited names, Dec 19, 1996
• Re: 60 day waiting period, Dec 21, 1996
• Re: 60 day waiting period, Dec 21, 1996
• INTA releases draft policy on domain names and trademarks, Dec 21, 1996
• Re: 60 day waiting period.... a suggestion ..., Dec 22, 1996
• Re: 60 day thought, Dec 22, 1996
• Re: Dispute resolution, Dec 22, 1996
• Re: 60 day waiting period.... a suggestion ..., Dec 22, 1996
• Re: 60 day thought, Dec 22, 1996
• Re: The view from my window, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: A long strange trip, Dec 24, 1996
• customers "belonging" to NSI, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Thread 2: 60-day issue, Dec 24, 1996