GTLD-MOU General Discussion List

• Christopher Ambler, cambler@iodesign.com
• Re: FCN.NET, ML.ORG, EU,ORG: Free DNR, Jun 18, 1998
• Christopher J. Post, cp15@cornell.edu
• Warehousing, TM violations & the new gTLD's, Aug 14, 1997
• Warehousing, TM violations & the new gTLD's, Aug 14, 1997
• Re: Warehousing, TM violations & the new gTLD's, Aug 15, 1997
• Re: Warehousing, TM violations & the new gTLD's, Aug 15, 1997
• Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?, Jun 12, 1998
• Update: Soil Water Lab Linux Box, Jun 12, 1998
• Christopher Palermo, Christopher_Palermo@next.com
• Re: 60 day period, Jan 10, 1997
• Christopher Paul, chris@nait.nl
• Re: What is this dribble?, May 20, 1998
• Christopher Sevcik, chris@sparknet.net
• Re: free.nic (was_Re: First come/First served)sh ns.eu.org cat .signature, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Conflict resolution? Where is the CHANNEL?, Nov 20, 1996
• re: list of TLD's, Dec 06, 1996
• Re: New TLDs and Registry charters, Dec 09, 1996
• Re: 60 day waiting peroid.... a suggestion ..., Dec 22, 1996
• 60 day thought, Dec 22, 1996
• Re: 60 day waiting period.... a suggestion ..., Dec 22, 1996
• Chuck Gomes, cgomes@internic.net
• Re: Can NSI add new roots? (Was: Emergent Press Conference), Nov 12, 1997
• Chuck Peters, mpcg@erie.net
• Please Help, Nov 20, 1996
• CirqueFan, CirqueFan@aol.com
• Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU, Sep 23, 1997
• Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU, Sep 23, 1997
• Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU, Sep 23, 1997
• Re: Trademarks Disputes, Sep 26, 1997
• Re: CORE == Big Brother ??, Feb 12, 1998
• Re: CORE == Big Brother ??, Feb 12, 1998
• Re: CORE == Big Brother ??, Feb 12, 1998
• Re: Well I read the thing..., Feb 13, 1998
• Re: ITAG: Not Another One!, Feb 13, 1998
• Re: ETSI vs. Magaziner whose interests? (was) RE: CORE == Big Brother ??, Feb 14, 1998
• Clemens Vermeulen, clemens@altnews.com.au
• Re: Tiered DNS Democracy, Oct 21, 1997
• Courtney Macavinta, courtm@cnet.com
• Request for Extension, Aug 26, 1997
• Craig A. Finseth, fin@winternet.com
• Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?, Jan 08, 1997
• Re: 60 day waiting period, Jan 13, 1997
• Craig Simon, cls@flywheel.com
• Re: Is Freedom the Lowest Common Denominator?, Jan 15, 1998
• Re: I demand Jeff Williams be censured for this racial slur WAS : Re: PAB nIANA facts, Jun 10, 1998
• Re: Commerce Subcommittee Hearings, Jun 10, 1998
• Re: Missing Archives, Jun 25, 1998
• CraigSimon, CraigSimon@aol.com
• gTLD Shared Repository meeting, Aug 14, 1997
• Subsidy and Acquisition, Nov 23, 1997
• Request for Interviews related to academic research, Dec 06, 1997
• Re: Trademarks are here to stay (was:Re: NIKE.BLOWS, DISNEY.SUCKS,MACDONALDS...., Jan 22, 1998
• Re: Academic Roots and Solutions for the Internet, Jan 24, 1998
• Re: Domain Names and Directories, Jan 29, 1998
• Re: Pre-registration or trademark theft?, Jan 30, 1998
• The $ Requirement of Running a Registry, Feb 07, 1998
• Re: gTLD's, Feb 13, 1998
• Re: TLD Government Auction, Feb 13, 1998
• Re: Public Resource vs Private Ownership, Feb 14, 1998
• Re: Are There Other TLD Lists?, May 21, 1998
• Re: Are There Other TLD Lists?, May 21, 1998
• Re: Are There Other TLD Lists?, May 22, 1998
• Re: Are There Other TLD Lists?, May 22, 1998
• Cristiano Volpi, volpic@etrurianet.it
• I: unsubscribe gtld-discuss, Feb 15, 1998
• I: unsubscribe, Feb 15, 1998
• unsubscribe, Feb 16, 1998
• No Subject, Feb 17, 1998
• unsubscribe, Feb 17, 1998
• Curt Mayer, curt@emergent.com
• Signal to Noise ratio, Oct 07, 1997
• Cutler, James, james.cutler@exch.eds.com
• RE: The user viewpoint, Dec 05, 1996
• Cyril FABRE, cfabre@gkb.com
• Suscribe cfabre@gkb.com, Jan 18, 1999
• d, d@d.tj
• Re: unsubscribe, May 04, 1998
• D. Chiodo, djc@microwave.com
• Re: Draft?, Dec 21, 1996
• Re: The view from my window, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: ISO 3166 recomendations., Dec 23, 1996
• Re: ISO 3166 recomendations., Dec 24, 1996
• Re: ISO 3166 recomendations., Dec 24, 1996
• The truth of the matter, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: The truth of the matter, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: ISO 3166 recomendations., Dec 24, 1996
• Re: An Open Letter to the IAHC, Dec 29, 1996
• Dale Mead, dcm@apple.com
• NSI v. Clue (was: Trademarks, random strings, sharing, reservedwords), Jan 07, 1997
• Dalvenjah FoxFire, dalvenjah@dal.net
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Nov 18, 1996
• Getting back to the topic at hand..., Nov 29, 1996
• Dan Baker, dan@dansworld.com
• Re: Light The Fire, Sep 10, 1997
• Dan Busarow, dan@dpcsys.com
• Re: Needed Clarification, Jun 18, 1997
• Re: Needed Clarification, Jun 18, 1997
• Re: gTLD-MoU Related News (August 19, 1997), Aug 19, 1997
• Re: Implications of NSI *Skunkworks* Rul ing, Nov 30, 1997
• Re: Implications of NSI *Skunkworks* Ruling, Dec 01, 1997
• Re: ISPs as stakeholders, Dec 02, 1997
• Re: ISPs as stakeholders, Dec 04, 1997
• Re: What happens after March 31,1998, Dec 14, 1997
• Re: CORE is innocent, Dec 17, 1997
• Re: major announcment from the POC?, Jan 22, 1998
• Re: 30/60 day first filing day (was: Trademarks are here to stay), Jan 23, 1998
• Re: Domain Names and Directories, Jan 29, 1998
• Re: firestorm, Jan 29, 1998
• Re: When Will the New GTLDs Come Into Effect?, Jan 31, 1998
• Re: When Will the New GTLDs Come Into Effect?, Jan 31, 1998
• Re: Representation on PAB, Feb 04, 1998
• Dan Kohn, dan@teledesic.com
• RE: gTLD-MoU Related News (August 19, 1997), Aug 19, 1997
• RE: the new gTLD registrar hardware requirements., Sep 07, 1997
• RE: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU, Sep 23, 1997
• Dan Singer, magnet@ao.net
• Plan Ahead - Think Big !, Jan 16, 1997
• Relinquish Control?, Jan 16, 1997
• Police the World?, Jan 16, 1997
• Dan Steinberg, dstein@travel-net.com
• Re: Legalese, Jul 17, 1997
• Daniel Kalchev, daniel@digsys.bg
• Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?, Jan 09, 1997
• Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?, Jan 13, 1997
• Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?, Jan 13, 1997
• Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?, Jan 13, 1997
• Multiple registrations by the same organziation and private registrations, Jan 14, 1997
• Re: How does a 60-day waiting period promote URL stability? (was something else), Jan 14, 1997
• Re: other issues with IAHC draft, Jan 17, 1997
• Daniel Kaplan, dkaplan@terra-nova.fr
• Re: Expansion of the IAHC, Dec 04, 1996
• Re: Expansion of the IAHC, Dec 04, 1996
• New TLDs and Registry charters, Dec 06, 1996
• More on New TLDs and Registry charters, Dec 06, 1996
• Re: New TLDs and Registry charters, Dec 07, 1996
• Re: New TLDs and Registry charters, Dec 07, 1996
• Re: The trademark issue, Dec 09, 1996
• Re: New TLDs and Registry charters, Dec 09, 1996
• Re: New TLDs and Registry charters, Dec 09, 1996
• No Subject, Dec 09, 1996
• Re: New TLDs and Registry charters, Dec 11, 1996
• Re: Int'l diversity in iTLD Registries, Dec 11, 1996
• Re: 60 day waiting peroid.... a suggestion ..., Dec 22, 1996
• Re: Thread 2: 60-day issue, Dec 27, 1996
• Re: Thread 2: 60-day issue, Dec 27, 1996
• Re: Thread 5: Defining the namespace, Dec 27, 1996
• Re: Thread 2: 60-day issue, Dec 27, 1996
• A position paper, Dec 27, 1996
• Re: application-based gTLDs, Dec 28, 1996
• Re: Thread 2: 60-day issue, Dec 28, 1996
• Re: Thread 5: Defining the namespace, Dec 28, 1996
• Re: A position paper, Dec 28, 1996
• Re: Thread 2: 60-day issue, Dec 28, 1996
• Re: A position paper, Dec 28, 1996
• Re: application-based gTLDs, Dec 30, 1996
• Re: Additonal top level domain name suggestions..., Dec 31, 1996
• Re: An Open Letter to the IAHC, Dec 31, 1996
• Re: Clarification please (was Re: Is stuttering the price to pa, Jan 02, 1997
• A collective contribution, Jan 14, 1997
• Several suggestions on IAHC's draft, Jan 15, 1997
• Re: Initial gTLD creation, Jan 17, 1997
• Re: What seven TLDs?, Jan 18, 1997
• Re: Possible new gTLD names..., Jan 23, 1997
• Daniel R. Tobias, dan@softdisk.com
• Re: Details for gTLD Shared Repository informal meeting, Aug 13, 1997
• Danny Padwa, padw7068@sparky.cs.nyu.edu
• Is 60 a magic number?, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Thread 3: selection of registrars, Dec 24, 1996
• Relationship of CORE and ISOC, timetable for current gTLD inclusion, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Relationship of CORE and ISOC, timetable for current gTLDinclusion, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: Specific Questions, Dec 26, 1996
• 60? day dissemination period, Jan 08, 1997
• Darrell Greenwood, Darrell_Greenwood@mindlink.net
• Re: .FCN Free Community Network (Re: Shared vs.Exclusive), Nov 22, 1996
• IAHC Draft _Not_ Soundly Shot Up, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: A position paper, Dec 28, 1996
• Re: A position paper, Dec 28, 1996
• Re: A position paper, Dec 29, 1996
• Hypothesis -- Mr. Jeff Williams is a Teenager., Dec 29, 1996
• Hypothesis -- Mr. Jeff Williams is a Fake, Dec 29, 1996
• Confirmed -- Mr. Jeff Williams is a Fake, Dec 29, 1996
• FAQ -- Jeff Williams (was Re: Balderdash), Dec 31, 1996
• RE: Thread 5: Defining the namespace, Dec 31, 1996
• Re: Notes (fwd), Jan 03, 1997
• FAQ -- Jeff Williams, Jan 06, 1997
• Jeff Williams' Fantasies (was Re: cutting down theextraneous traffic, Jan 10, 1997
• Re: Lack Of Credibility?, Sep 17, 1997
• Jeff Williams' FAQ (was Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's, Sep 22, 1997
• Jeff Williams' FAQ (was Re: Trademark Disputes, Sep 26, 1997
• Jeff Williams and his fantasies (was Re: combinedshared/private?, Oct 04, 1997
• Jeff Williams FAQ (Updated) (was Re: Truth in Advertising[ACP Style], Oct 06, 1997
• Thank You, Oct 11, 1997
• Re: Press Information on Emergent Agreement, Nov 04, 1997
• Jeff Williams FAQ (was Re: Emergent Press Conference, Nov 06, 1997
• Jeff Williams' FAQ (and Fantasies - 98/01) (was Re: HowMany TLDs? 30,000!..., Jan 29, 1998
• Jeff Williams' FAQ (and Fantasies - 98/02) (was Re: Nothingfor everybody, Jan 31, 1998
• Jeff's FAQ (was Re: CORE == Big Brother ??, Feb 12, 1998
• Public Resource vs Private Ownership (was) Re: ETSI vs.Magaziner whose interests?, Feb 13, 1998
• Re: Public Resource vs Private Ownership, Feb 13, 1998
• Re: Public Resource vs Private Ownership, Feb 13, 1998
• Jeff Williams' FAQ. (98/03) (was Re: Threat fromChristopher Ambler, Feb 24, 1998
• Jeff Williams FAQ -- (was Re: OFF TOPIC ==> Re: IAHCarchive [was Re: Comments on gTLD-MOULeadership [was: Bob shawsmisrepresentation of Jeff williams's comments]], May 14, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Full text Comparison of Bylaws Proposals, Oct 16, 1998
• Jeff Williams' FAQ (was Re: Congratulations Jeff), Oct 29, 1998
• Jeff Williams' Claims to 1998 (was Re: [ifwp] Re:Microsoft's new browser, Nov 06, 1998
• Jeff Williams' FAQ (was Re: [ifwp] About Bind..., Nov 13, 1998
• Jeff Williams FAQ (was Re: what ICANN is up to), Jan 20, 1999
• Jeff Williams' FAQ (99/03) (was Re: Stakeholders ignored inSIngapore DNSO meeting, Mar 04, 1999
• Jeff Williams' FAQ (99/04) (was Re: JW's identity ), Apr 22, 1999
• Das Devaraj, das@netcom.com
• Re: Responses to Responses, Dec 13, 1996
• Re: Directory Services A Great Help, Dec 14, 1996
• Re: con men, Dec 17, 1996
• A question about protocol, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: registries and lotteries, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: A question about protocol, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Thread 3: selection of registrars, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Revised Draft, Dec 25, 1996
• Opposing Trademarks, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: Registration of Common Names, Dec 26, 1996
• Tally of 3 to 1 (Was Re: A position paper), Dec 28, 1996
• Re: Thread 5: Defining the namespace (was Re: Thread 1: Sharing), Dec 30, 1996
• Re: Anti Capitalism?, Dec 30, 1996
• Re: Consensus Development, Jan 02, 1997
• Re: Trademarks, random strings, sharing, reserved words, Jan 06, 1997
• Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?, Jan 08, 1997
• Re: Trademarks, random strings, sharing, reserved words, Jan 13, 1997
• Dave Crocker, dcrocker@brandenburg.com
• Let the games begin, Nov 16, 1996
• Re: Let the games begin, Nov 17, 1996
• charter again accessible, Nov 17, 1996
• Re: monoplistic practises, Nov 17, 1996
• Re: Regestry Identifiers, Nov 17, 1996
• Re: Regestry Identifiers, Nov 17, 1996
• Re: Regestry Identifiers, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: Where are we going?, Nov 18, 1996
• First come/First served, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: Where are we going?, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Nov 18, 1996
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Nov 19, 1996
• Shared data base access by registries, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Shared data base access by registries, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Where are we going, and root servers?, Nov 19, 1996
• Reading the charter (was Re: Conflict resolution?), Nov 19, 1996
• IAHC 'business' composition, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Reading the charter (was Re: Conflict resolution?), Nov 19, 1996
• Doing work via the iahc-discuss list, Nov 19, 1996
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Nov 19, 1996
• Framework for IAHC proposals, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Shared domains, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Shared data base access by registries, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: (Original) Conflict resolution revisited, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Shared data base access by registries, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Framework for IAHC proposals, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Nov 20, 1996
• Re: Let the games begin, Nov 20, 1996
• Reminder: request for proposals, Nov 21, 1996
• Postel's draft, Nov 22, 1996
• Re: -discuss members, Nov 24, 1996
• Re: Hijacked Domain Names?, Nov 24, 1996
• TLD assignment permanence, Nov 24, 1996
• Re: Current iTLDs, Nov 24, 1996
• Re: don heath's comments, Nov 24, 1996
• Re: your mail, Nov 24, 1996
• Re: Specific goals, Nov 26, 1996
• Re: Draft-denninger-02, Nov 27, 1996
• Current submissions, Dec 01, 1996
• Re: IAHC Philosophy, Dec 02, 1996
• Distracting ourselves successfully, Dec 05, 1996
• Re: Schedule, Dec 05, 1996
• Instructions for unsubscribing from iahc-discuss list, Dec 06, 1996
• What is a registry selling?, Dec 07, 1996
• Re: New TLDs and Registry charters, Dec 07, 1996
• Re: New TLDs and Registry charters, Dec 15, 1996
• shared registries (was Re: Int'l diversity in iTLD Registries), Dec 15, 1996
• Re: Int'l diversity in iTLD Registries, Dec 15, 1996
• Re: trademark law, Dec 15, 1996
• Re: trademark law, Dec 15, 1996
• Re: tpc.int is no fraud, Dec 15, 1996
• IAHC Draft Specification now available, Dec 20, 1996
• Re: Draft, Dec 20, 1996
• Problems with draft formats, Dec 20, 1996
• Re: registries and lotteries, Dec 21, 1996
• Re: 60 day waiting peroid., Dec 21, 1996
• Re: Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft, Dec 21, 1996
• Re: 60 day waiting peroid., Dec 21, 1996
• Re: Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft, Dec 21, 1996
• Re: lottery, Dec 21, 1996
• Re: ISO 3166 recomendations., Dec 21, 1996
• Re: Waiting peroid, Dec 21, 1996
• Re: Congradulations, Dec 22, 1996
• Re: Congradulations, Dec 22, 1996
• Re: 60 day thought, Dec 22, 1996
• Re: Dispute resolution, Dec 22, 1996
• Proposal & Press release updates, Dec 22, 1996
• FCFS and prior use, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: Indepent view of the draft, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: Exclusive License, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: FCFS and prior use, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: The view from my window, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: CORE, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: Monopoly/Ologopoly, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: My comments, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: CORE, Dec 23, 1996
• Re: My comments, Dec 23, 1996
• Reply to coercion, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Trademarks, random strings, sharing, reserved words, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Trademarks, random strings, sharing, reserved words, Dec 24, 1996
• Limiting the number of registrars and gTLDs, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: My comments, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: An observation, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Limiting the number of registrars and gTLDs, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Monopoly/Ologopoly, Dec 24, 1996
• Re: Specific Questions, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: An observation, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: An observation, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: The view from my window, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: Relationship of CORE and ISOC, timetable for current gTLD inclusion, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: Relationship of CORE and ISOC, timetable for current gTLDinclusion, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: Revised Draft, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: Revised Draft, Dec 25, 1996
• Paying for selection, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: A long strange trip, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: Thread 1: Sharing, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: Thread 1: Sharing, Dec 25, 1996
• Voting, Dec 25, 1996
• Re: Specific Questions, Dec 26, 1996
• Re: An observation, Dec 26, 1996
• Re: An observation, Dec 26, 1996
• Re: An observation, Dec 26, 1996
• Re: Specific Questions, Dec 26, 1996
• Re: Relationship of CORE and ISOC, timetable for current gTLD inclusion, Dec 26, 1996