GTLD-MOU General Discussion List

• Jan 13, 1997
• Re: 60 day waiting period, Paul Svensson
• Re: 60 day waiting period, Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Re[4]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Kent Crispin
• Re: 60 day waiting period, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?, Gary Morrell
• Re: 60 day waiting period, Carl Oppedahl
• Re: Re[2]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Kent Crispin
• Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?, Jeff Williams
• Re: Re[2]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Carl Oppedahl
• Jan 14, 1997
• Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?, Simon Higgs
• Re: 60 day waiting period, Simon Higgs
• And now, something completely different, Paul Svensson
• Re: And now, something completely different, Christopher Ambler
• Re: Re[2]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Kent Crispin
• Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?, Dave Crocker
• Re: Repository services and budget, Dave Crocker
• Re: Interesting Domain Name Trademark Dispute (fwd), Dave Crocker
• Re: TLD charters, Dave Crocker
• Re: Repository services and budget, Dave Crocker
• Re: 60 Day Wait, Dave Crocker
• Re: Re[2]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Carl Oppedahl
• Re: And now, something completely different, Jeff Williams
• Trademarks, Marty Modell
• Re: For your amusement.., Marty Modell
• Re: 60 Day Wait, Jeff Williams
• Re: Trademarks, Jeff Williams
• Re: Re[2]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Simon Higgs
• Re: And now, something completely different, Perry E. Metzger
• Re: Repository services and budget, Simon Higgs
• Use of Repository Data for Certain Purposes, Robert Frank
• RE: Trademarks, Robert Frank
• Re: And now, something completely different, Perry E. Metzger
• Re: Re[4]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Dave Crocker
• Re: Repository services and budget, Rick H. Wesson
• Re: Re[2]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Dave Crocker
• Re: Repository services and budget, Dave Crocker
• Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Alan Sullivan
• Re: Re[2]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Kent Crispin
• Re: Re[4]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Kent Crispin
• Re: Use of Repository Data for Certain Purposes, Kent Crispin
• Re: Trademarks, Kent Crispin
• Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Dave Crocker
• Re: Use of Repository Data for Certain Purposes, Axel H. Horns
• Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Paul Svensson
• Re: And now, something completely different, Paul Svensson
• Re: Trademarks, Leo Smith
• Re: Re[4]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Leo Smith
• Re: Re[2]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Simon Higgs
• Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Simon Higgs
• Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?, Albert Tramposch
• Re: Who really benefits from 60-day period?, Albert Tramposch
• How does a 60-day waiting period promote URL stability? (was something else), Carl Oppedahl
• Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Carl Oppedahl
• How does it work in civil-law countries? (Was something else), Carl Oppedahl
• Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else), Carl Oppedahl
• Re: IAHC Proposal encourages domain name speculation? (was something else), Carl Oppedahl
• Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), David Collier-Brown
• 60 day wait, webmaster
• A collective contribution, Daniel Kaplan
• Re: How does it work in civil-law countries? (Was something else), Jeff Williams
• Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else), Leo Smith
• To all submitters of comments and proposals, Ivo Essenberg
• 60 Day wait, Leo Smith
• Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Vince Wolodkin
• Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Repository services and budget, Vince Wolodkin
• Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Repository services and budget, Vince Wolodkin
• Re: How does it work in civil-law countries? (Was something else), Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else), Vince Wolodkin
• Re: 60 day wait, Dave Crocker
• Re: Repository services and budget, Marcel Schneider
• Multiple registrations by the same organziation and private registrations, Daniel Kalchev
• Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Alan Sullivan
• Re: 60 day wait, William M. Gilligan
• Re: How does a 60-day waiting period promote URL stability? (wassomething else), Leo Smith
• Re: How does a 60-day waiting period promote URL stability? (was something else), Daniel Kalchev
• Re: How does it work in civil-law countries? (Was something else), Carl Oppedahl
• Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else), Carl Oppedahl
• Re: And now, something completely different, Christopher Ambler
• Re: And now, something completely different, Christopher Ambler
• Re: 60 Day wait, Perry E. Metzger
• Re: How does it work in civil-law countries? (Was something else), Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else), Bryant Durrell
• Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else), Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else), David Collier-Brown
• A Better Idea, Michael Dillon
• Re: Repository services and budget, Perry E. Metzger
• Panavision, domain names and trademarks, Robert Frank
• Availability of aggregate repository data, Kent Crispin
• Re: Repository services and budget, Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Repository services and budget, Dave Crocker
• Re: Repository services and budget, Dave Crocker
• Re: 60 Day Wait, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Repository services and budget, Perry E. Metzger
• Re: Repository services and budget, Kent Crispin
• Re: Repository services and budget, Rick H. Wesson
• Re:60 Day wait..NSI case history, Leo Smith
• Another approach to domain name stability, Kent Crispin
• Re: Repository services and budget, Rick H. Wesson