GTLD-MOU General Discussion List

• Jan 14, 1997
• Re: Repository services and budget, Perry E. Metzger
• Re: Repository services and budget, Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Availability of aggregate repository data, Michael Dillon
• RE: A Better Idea, Robert Frank
• Re: Panavision, domain names and trademarks, Kent Crispin
• Re: A Better Idea, Vince Wolodkin
• Availability of aggregate repository data, Robert Frank
• Re: Availability of aggregate repository data, Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Repository services and budget, Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Repository services and budget, Simon Higgs
• Re: Repository services and budget, Perry E. Metzger
• Re: Repository services and budget, Perry E. Metzger
• Re: Panavision, domain names and trademarks, Michael Dillon
• Re: Availability of aggregate repository data, Kent Crispin
• Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon), Carl Oppedahl
• Re: Repository services and budget, Simon Higgs
• Re: TLD charters, Don Heath
• Re: Repository services and budget, Perry E. Metzger
• Jan 15, 1997
• MONEYMAKER - Domain names, Michael Dillon
• Re: 60 day wait, davidk
• Re: Another approach to domain name stability, Leo Smith
• Re:60 Day wait..NSI case history, Simon Higgs
• Re: 60 day wait, Michael Dillon
• [Ignore] More anal retentive crap from Perry Metzger, Simon Higgs
• Re: Repository services and budget, Kevin Brown
• Re: 60 day wait, Kevin Brown
• Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else), Kevin Brown
• Re: Repository services and budget, Kevin Brown
• comments on the draft specifications for administration and management of gTLDs by cnNIC, qian tianbai
• Re: Repository services and budget, Michael Dillon
• Re: 60 Day Wait (fwd), Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Repository services and budget, Kent Crispin
• Re: Repository services and budget, Kevin Brown
• Re: Another approach to domain name stability, Kevin Brown
• Correction, Ivo Essenberg
• Re: 60 day waste, Leo Smith
• Re: Panavision, domain names and trademarks, Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Repository services and budget, Eugene Kashpureff
• Re: How does a 60-day waiting period promote URL stability? (was something else), Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
• Re: Availability of aggregate repository data, Axel H. Horns
• Re: Panavision, domain names and trademarks, Carl Oppedahl
• Database Public ?, Eugene Kashpureff
• Re: Repository services and budget, Michael Dillon
• Several suggestions on IAHC's draft, Daniel Kaplan
• Re: Availability of aggregate repository data, Kent Crispin
• Re: Repository services and budget, Jeff Williams
• Re: 60 Day Wait, Jeff Williams
• Re: Repository services and budget, Jeff Williams
• Re: Another approach to domain name stability, Jeff Williams
• Re: Panavision, domain names and trademarks, Aveek Datta
• Re: Repository services and budget, davidk
• Re: Availability of aggregate repository data, Michael Dillon
• Re: Panavision, domain names and trademarks, Michael Dillon
• thought for the day, Robert Frank
• Long domain names got you down? Here's the solution., Michael Dillon
• Re: Panavision, domain names and trademarks, Aveek Datta
• Jan 16, 1997
• Re: Another approach to domain name stability, Marty Modell
• Network Solutions' Response to IAHC Draft, J. Christopher Clough
• Re: Repository services and budget, Jeff Williams
• Re: Network Solutions' Response to IAHC Draft, Christopher Ambler
• NSI shareing .COM?, Rick H. Wesson
• Re: Network Solutions' Response to IAHC Draft, Karl Auerbach
• Re: How does a 60-day waiting period promote URL stability? (was something else), KOON SANG LIM
• improving format of "Immediate SLDs", Matt Power
• Re: NSI shareing .COM?, Simon Higgs
• Re: Repository services and budget, Kevin Brown
• Re: comments on the draft specifications for administration and, Axel H. Horns
• CORE issues, Kent Crispin
• Gabe Battista says... (was Re: 60 Day wait..NSI case history), Simon Higgs
• Re: Long domain names got you down? Here's the solution., Hank Nussbacher
• Re: Network Solutions' Response to IAHC Draft, KOON SANG LIM
• Re: Network Solutions' Response to IAHC Draft, Ivan Pope
• Re: Network Solutions' Response to IAHC Draft, Simon Higgs
• Re: Long domain names got you down? Here's the solution., Aveek Datta
• Re: Network Solutions' Response to IAHC Draft, Carl Oppedahl
• (Fwd) The Canadian solution to domain name disputes, Axel H. Horns
• Plan Ahead - Think Big !, Dan Singer
• Relinquish Control?, Dan Singer
• Police the World?, Dan Singer
• Initial gTLD creation, Kent Crispin
• .africa gTLD, Tierno S. Bah
• Remove, tucker.er
• Re: The Canadian solution to domain name disputes, Axel H. Horns
• Re: Network Solutions' Response to IAHC Draft, Aveek Datta
• what's good for the goose . . ., Gary Morrell
• Re: .africa gTLD, Dr Nii Narku Quaynor
• A modest proposal--add <trademark> tag to solve domain name problem, Jonathan Ezor
• Re: Repository services and budget, Denis Bucher
• Re: How does a 60-day waiting period promote URL stability? (was something else), davidk
• Re: .africa gTLD, Oscar A. Robles Garay
• Jan 17, 1997
• Re: Initial gTLD creation, davidk
• Re: .africa gTLD, Philip J. Nesser II
• FYI: some more data on privacy concerns with the whois data, davidk
• Re: Initial gTLD creation, Kent Crispin
• An alternative to the lottery, Alan Sullivan
• Re: what's good for the goose . . ., Paul E. Hoffman
• Re: FYI: some more data on privacy concerns with the whois data, Michael Dillon
• Re: what's good for the goose . . ., Michael Dillon
• other issues with IAHC draft, Matt Power
• Re: .africa gTLD, Tierno S. Bah