GTLD-MOU General Discussion List

• Nov 21, 1996
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Simon Higgs
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Simon Higgs
• Re: The end of DNS as we know it, Simon Higgs
• Re: Hijacked Domain Names?, David R. Conrad
• Re: "Acceptance" of money, Bob Allisat
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Michael Dillon
• Re: Hijacked Domain Names?, Bob Allisat
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Michael Dillon
• FreeNIC,AlterNIC,InterNIC,AnyNIC: ALL EQUAL (Re: Hijacked Domain Names?), Bob Allisat
• Re: Conflict resolution?, George Michaelson
• Re: FreeNIC,AlterNIC,InterNIC,AnyNIC: ALL EQUAL (Re: Hijacked Domain Names?), David R. Conrad
• Re: [FYI] Shared Top Level Domain Mailing List Info, David R. Conrad
• Prior Use (Was: Re: "Acceptance" of money), Ron Fitzherbert
• Re: Legal Solutions? (Re: Conflict resolution?), G. Gervaise Davis III
• Re: Conflict resolution?, G. Gervaise Davis III
• TM v. DNS, Jim Browning
• Re: FreeNIC,AlterNIC,InterNIC,AnyNIC: ALL EQUAL (Re: Hijacked Domain Names?), Aveek Datta
• RE: Let the games begin, G. Gervaise Davis III
• RE: "Acceptance" of money, Jim Browning
• Re: Conflict resolution?, G. Gervaise Davis III
• Long-term viability: telephone numbers as aliases, Lloyd S. Etheredge
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Gert Blij
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Simon Higgs
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Simon Higgs
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Michael Dillon
• Fwd: TM v. DNS, Albert Tramposch
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Hank Nussbacher
• Re: PRIOR USE (Re: Am I confused?), David R. Conrad
• Re: Hijacked Domain Names?, Hank Nussbacher
• "int" domain, MURAKAMI
• Re: "int" domain, shaw
• Re: "int" domain, Masaya Nakayama
• Re: The end of DNS as we know it, Paul Ferguson
• Re: "int" domain, Patrick.VANDE-WALLE
• Re: "int" domain, Mark Henderson-Thynne
• Re: [FYI] Shared Top Level Domain Mailing List Info, Bob Allisat
• Open Letter to UNCLE SAM (Re: PRIOR USE (Re: Am I confused?), Johnny Cannuck
• Re: "int" domain, Edgar Der-Danieliantz
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Tony Rutkowski
• Re: Shared data base access by registries, Thomas M. McGhan
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Open Letter to UNCLE SAM (Re: PRIOR USE (Re: Am I confused?), Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Hijacked Domain Names?, Paul Lustgraaf
• Re: Open Letter to UNCLE SAM (Re: PRIOR USE (Re: Am I confused?), Bob Allisat
• Re: Long-term viability: telephone numbers as aliases, Thomas M. McGhan
• Re: Hijacked Domain Names?, Bob Allisat
• Re: Hijacked Domain Names--should be: Hijacked Network, Thomas M. McGhan
• Unambiguous ownership, Matthew Skala
• Reminder: request for proposals, Dave Crocker
• Re: Shared data base access by registries, Thomas M. McGhan
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Aveek Datta
• Re: Hijacked Domain Names--should be: Hijacked Network, Johnny Cannuck
• Re: Open Letter to UNCLE SAM (Re: PRIOR USE (Re: Am I confused?, Joseph A. Falejczyk
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Johnny Cannuck
• Re: "int" domain, bmanning
• Re: Open Letter to UNCLE SAM (Re: PRIOR USE (Re: Am I confused?, Johnny Cannuck
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Johnny Cannuck
• Re: "int" domain, bmanning
• Re: Long-term viability: telephone numbers as aliases, John R Levine
• Re: Open Letter to UNCLE SAM (Re: PRIOR USE (Re: Am I confused?), Michael Dillon
• Re: The end of DNS as we know it, Kent Crispin
• Stop the Madness!, David Medinets
• improve signal-to-noise ratio here, Thomas M. McGhan
• RE: Long-term viability: telephone numbers as aliases, Alexis Bor
• Re: Conflict resolution?, G. Gervaise Davis III
• Re: Long-term viability: telephone numbers as aliases, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Hank Nussbacher
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Hank Nussbacher
• Re: "int" domain, postel
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Aveek Datta
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, shaw
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Simon Higgs
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Simon Higgs
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Kent Crispin
• Re: The end of DNS as we know it, Simon Higgs
• RE: Open Letter to UNCLE SAM, Adrian Cooper
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Vince Wolodkin
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: The end of DNS as we know it, Kent Crispin
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, George Michaelson
• Nov 22, 1996
• Re: improve signal-to-noise ratio here, Bob Allisat
• .FCN Free Community Network (Re: Shared vs. Exclusive), Bob Allisat
• Re: Conflict resolution?, David R. Conrad
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Perry E. Metzger
• Re: Conflict resolution?, G. Gervaise Davis III
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Leonid Egoshin
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Alexandre Khalil
• Re: .FCN Free Community Network (Re: Shared vs.Exclusive), Darrell Greenwood
• procedure for applying, Steve Sullivan
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, David R. Conrad
• Re: Conflict resolution?, Simon Higgs
• Country Code TLDs, Jon Postel
• REMOVE MY NAME FROM YOUR LIST!!!!!!!!!, SpotTheCat
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Kent Crispin
• re: don heath's comments, Paul A Vixie
• Disposition of the TLD applications made to the IANA, Jon Postel
• Regestry Implementation, Rick H. Wesson
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Hank Nussbacher
• Re: Shared vs. Exclusive, Hank Nussbacher
• Re: Regestry Implementation, Aveek Datta