GTLD-MOU General Discussion List

• Re : .africa gTLD, (continued)
  • Re : .africa gTLD, Tierno S. Bah
    • Re: Re : .africa gTLD, Dr Nii Narku Quaynor
    • Re: Re : .africa gTLD, Michael Dillon
    • Re: .africa gTLD, Tierno S. Bah
  • Re: .africa gTLD, Tierno S. Bah
  • Re: .africa gTLD, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
    • Re: .africa gTLD, Amandeep Sandhu
  • Re: .africa gTLD, Tierno S. Bah
  • Re: .africa gTLD, Tierno S. Bah
    • Re: .africa gTLD, Michael Dillon
      • Re: .africa gTLD, Dr Nii Narku Quaynor
    • Re: .africa gTLD, Dr Nii Narku Quaynor
  • Re: .africa gTLD, KOON SANG LIM
  • Re: .africa gTLD, KOON SANG LIM
    • Re : .africa gTLD, Tierno S. Bah
      • Re: Re : .africa gTLD, Bryant Durrell
      • Re: Re : .africa gTLD, Vince Wolodkin
        • Re: Re : .africa gTLD, Perry E. Metzger
        • Re: .africa gTLD, Tierno S. Bah
          • Re: .africa gTLD, Vince Wolodkin
  • Re: .africa gTLD, Tierno S. Bah
  • Re: .africa gTLD, KOON SANG LIM
  • Re: .africa gTLD, Tierno S. Bah
• Re: FW: .AFRICA TLD, John Palmer
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: FW: .AFRICA TLD, Bob Allisat
• Re: .COM and CORE, Jeff Williams
• .COM mostly in North America?, Bruce Balden
  • Re: .COM mostly in North America?, Jim Dixon
• Re:.com should remain 'geographically central' to NorthAmerica?, Bob Allisat
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re:.com should remain 'geographically central' to NorthAmerica?, C C Magnus Gustavsson
• Re:.com should remain 'geographically central' toNorthAmerica?, Bob Allisat
  • CORE is innocent, Ivan Pope
  • Re:.com should remain 'geographically central' toNorthAmerica?, Ivan Pope
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Re:.com should remain 'geographically central' toNorthAmerica?, Bruce Balden
    • Re: Re:.com should remain 'geographically central' toNorthAmerica?, Bob Allisat
    • Natione v. generic / ruleset v. restriction, Ivan Pope
      • Re: Natione v. generic / ruleset v. restriction, Heather Islip
• Re:.com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Bob Allisat
  • Re:.com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Ivan Pope
    • Re:.com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Jim Dixon
      • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, John Charles Broomfield
        • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Jim Dixon
          • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, John Charles Broomfield
            • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Jim Dixon
              • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, John Charles Broomfield
              • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Antony Van Couvering
              • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Jim Dixon
              • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Kent Crispin
              • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Jeff Williams
              • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Jim Dixon
              • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Jay
              • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Kent Crispin
              • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Dave Crocker / IMC
              • Client <-> Registrar relations, Ivan Pope
              • Re: Client <-> Registrar relations, Dave Crocker / IMC
              • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Jay
              • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Kent Crispin
      • Disputes with registrars vs disputes with CORE, Kent Crispin
        • Re: Disputes with registrars vs disputes with CORE, Jim Dixon
          • Re: Disputes with registrars vs disputes with CORE, John Charles Broomfield
          • Re: Disputes with registrars vs disputes with CORE, Kent Crispin
    • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Jeff Williams
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: .com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?, Jay
• Re:.com should remain 'geographicallycentral'toNorthAmerica?, Bob Allisat
• Re: .COM TLD, DNS and the English Language, Carl Oppedahl
  • Re: .COM TLD, DNS and the English Language, Vince Wolodkin
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: .COM TLD, DNS and the English Language, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
  • Re: .COM TLD, DNS and the English Language, Carl Oppedahl
• .dog, Stephen Cole
  • Re: .dog, Jim Dixon
  • Re: .dog, John Charles Broomfield
• Re: .erotica or .sex ? Magaziner says _no way_., Will Rodger
• .eu and .eur, Robert Shaw
  • Re: .eu and .eur, Jeff Williams
• RE: .eur anyone?, Roberto Gaetano
• .FCN .WTV Top Level Domain Name Claim, World TeleVirtual Network
• .FCN alpha Domain Name Registry, Bob Allisat
• .FCN Free Community Network (Re: Shared vs. Exclusive), Bob Allisat
  • Re: .FCN Free Community Network (Re: Shared vs.Exclusive), Darrell Greenwood
• RE: .LATIN TLD, Bob Allisat
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: .LATIN TLD, Bob Allisat
• Re: The .ly Domain (was Re: HouseTestimony of Andrew Sernovitz), World TeleVirtual Network
• .ly: Letter from the UK Government Department of Trade andIndustry, Mark Henderson-Thynne
• Re: .MALL Top Level Domain, Joseph A. Falejczyk
• .proj, Matt Rice
• Re: .rec, .arts etc, andi payn
• Re: .web, Jeff Williams
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: .web, Jeff Williams
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
        • Re: .web, Jeff Williams
          • Re: .web, John Charles Broomfield
            • Re: .web, Jay
              • Re: .web, Dave Crocker / IMC
              • Re: .web, Jay
              • Re: .web, Paul Svensson
              • Message not available
              • Re: .web, Jeff Williams
              • Re: .web, Jay
              • Re: .web, Kent Crispin
              • Re: .web, Duane Little
              • Re: .web, Duane Little
              • Message not available
              • Re: .web, Jeff Williams