GTLD-MOU General Discussion List

• Re: 71% or so of .COM registrants are Americans:Right!, (continued)
  • Re: 71% or so of .COM registrants are Americans:Right!, Bob Allisat
    • 51% of domain registrants are not Americans, Mark Henderson-Thynne
      • Re: 51% of domain registrants are not Americans, Jim Dixon
        • Re: 51% of domain registrants are not Americans, Mark Henderson-Thynne
        • Re: 51% of domain registrants are not Americans, Ivan Pope
    • CORE exists states Allisat!, Ivan Pope
• Re: [ GIG-TALK ] Is the gTLD-MoU a fait accompli?, Richard J. Sexton
  • Re: [ GIG-TALK ] Is the gTLD-MoU a fait accompli?, Jeff Williams
  • Re: [ GIG-TALK ] Is the gTLD-MoU a fait accompli?, Jeff Williams
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [ GIG-TALK ] Is the gTLD-MoU a fait accompli?, Richard J. Sexton
  • Re: [ GIG-TALK ] Is the gTLD-MoU a fait accompli?, Stephen Cole
  • RE: [ GIG-TALK ] Is the gTLD-MoU a fait accompli?, Palmer, John
• Re: [ GIG-TALK ] Re: Tiered DNS Democracy, andi payn
  • Re: [ GIG-TALK ] Re: Tiered DNS Democracy, Rick H. Wesson
• Re: [ GIG-VOTE ] authentication vs nomination, Jeff Williams
• Re: [ RSCTALK ] TLD Nominations, Jay
• [apnic-talk] Re: Funny. The White Paper confirms most speculations!, Jeff Williams
  • What was left out? AURSC ... Re: Funny. The White Paper confirms most speculations!, Adam Todd
    • Re: DNS: [apnic-talk] What was left out? AURSC ... Re: Funny. The White Paper confirms most speculations!, Rick Welykochy
• Re: [apnic-talk] RE: White Paper follow up, Jeff Williams
• [brian@hursley.ibm.com: IAB statement on US Government White Paper], Kent Crispin
  • Re: [brian@hursley.ibm.com: IAB statement on US Government White Paper], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: [ispc-list] US Domain Future Developments (fwd)], Eric Weisberg
  • The second of two, Eric Weisberg
    • Third of?, Eric Weisberg
    • Fourth and Last?, Eric Weisberg
• [Fwd: closed One Project. One PAB. One List], Mark Measday
• [Fwd: DNSO Important update: The "Merged" Draft], Amadeu Abril i Abril
• Re: [Fwd: DNSO Status Report and Draft Bylaws Changes], Amadeu Abril i Abril
• [Fwd: DRAFT Version of the IPv8 TLDs], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: Fw: IETF enemies ?], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: IAHC Root Servers ?], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: PAB marketing suggestion], Mark Measday
• [Fwd: PAB Opens Mailing List], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: Re: A long strange trip], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: Re: A question about protocol], Jeff Williams
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: A question about protocol], Alan Sullivan
• [Fwd: Re: Dividing the work...], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: Re: gTLD-MoU News (August 22, 1997)], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: Re: Hudson & Associates "Hudson's Solution" RE. tm.x], Benjamin Azevedo
• [Fwd: Re: Hypothesis -- Mr. Jeff Williams is a Teenager.], Jeff Williams
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [Fwd: Re: Hypothesis -- Mr. Jeff Williams is a Teenager.], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: Re: People mass-purchasing domains], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: Re: STOP gTLD-MoU], Vince Wolodkin
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [Fwd: Re: STOP gTLD-MoU], Albert Tramposch
• Re: [Fwd: Re: Trademark Disputes], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: Re: TradeMarks classification works, and also ".tm" TLD], Benjamin Azevedo
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: TradeMarks classification works, and also ".tm" TLD], John Charles Broomfield
• [Fwd: Re: Warehousing, TM violations & the new gTLD's], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: Re: Who Am I? (or whoami? in BSDese)], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: The authors thank Jeff Williams...], Jeff Williams
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [Fwd: The authors thank Jeff Williams...], Geurs Dave-xdat11
• [Fwd: two new root only servers], Vince Wolodkin
  • Re: [Fwd: two new root only servers], Bryant Durrell
  • Re: [Fwd: two new root only servers], Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
    • Re: [Fwd: two new root only servers], Vince Wolodkin
      • Re: [Fwd: two new root only servers], Perry E. Metzger
        • Re: [Fwd: two new root only servers], Eugene Kashpureff
  • Re: [Fwd: two new root only servers], Eugene Kashpureff
    • Re: [Fwd: two new root only servers], Vince Wolodkin
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [Fwd: two new root only servers], Don Heath
• [Fwd: UFN paths given in a browser type environment.], Jeff Williams
• [Fwd: UN to issue net controls????], Jeff Williams
• Re: [fwd] United States, EU differ on global standards for the Net, Sascha Ignjatovic
• Re: [FYI] Shared Top Level Domain Mailing List Info, Bob Allisat
  • Re: [FYI] Shared Top Level Domain Mailing List Info, David R. Conrad
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [FYI] Shared Top Level Domain Mailing List Info, Bob Allisat
• Re: [ifwp] Jeff Williams' FAQ (was Re: About Bind..., Bob Allisat
  • Re: [ifwp] Jeff Williams' FAQ (was Re: About Bind..., Norbert Lienig
    • Re: [ifwp] Jeff Williams' FAQ (was Re: About Bind..., Jeff Williams
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [ifwp] Jeff Williams' FAQ (was Re: About Bind..., Garret Krampe
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Full text Comparison of Bylaws Proposals, Darrell Greenwood
• Re: [INTA] Trademarks and Domain Names, Leo Smith
  • Re: [INTA] Trademarks and Domain Names, Jeff Williams
  • CORRECTION - Re: [INTA] Trademarks and Domain Names, Betty Schafer
• [Oz-ISP] Action over the Bill (fwd), Garret Krampe
  • Re: [Oz-ISP] Action over the Bill (fwd), Brendan Bouffler
• [Submission] Existing TLD Applications, Simon Higgs
  • Re: [Submission] Existing TLD Applications, John R Levine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • FWD: Re: [Submission] Existing TLD Applications, Ivo Essenberg
• [Third Revised Draft] of Substantive Guidelines for ACPs Now Available, Robert Shaw
• About the personnal domains, Denis Bucher
  • Re: About the personnal domains, Simon Higgs
    • Re: About the personnal domains, Aveek Datta
  • Re: About the personnal domains, Aveek Datta
  • Re: About the personnal domains, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Academic Roots and Solutions for the Internet, Tim Beckham
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Academic Roots and Solutions for the Internet, CraigSimon
• ACRONYMANIACS!, Bob Allisat
• Actioneer wanted for Domain MICHIGAN.COM, John P. Palmer
• Re: addendum to the gTLD MoU / Lack Of Credibility?, andi payn
  • Re: addendum to the gTLD MoU / Lack Of Credibility?, Jeff Williams
  • Re: addendum to the gTLD MoU / Lack Of Credibility?, Jim Dixon
• Re: addendum to the gTLD MOU: phase 1: building a list, andi payn
  • Re: addendum to the gTLD MOU: phase 1: building a list, Jeff Williams
    • Re: addendum to the gTLD MOU: phase 1: building a list, Jim Dixon
• Adding two letters and a dot renders unoffensive?, Carl Oppedahl
  • Re: Adding two letters and a dot renders unoffensive?, Vince Wolodkin
    • Re: Adding two letters and a dot renders unoffensive?, Karl Auerbach
      • Re: Adding two letters and a dot renders unoffensive?, Paul Svensson