GTLD-MOU General Discussion List Archive Subject Directory

[Author Index Start]	[Subject Index Start]	[Date Index Start]
[Author Directory]	[Subject Directory]	[Date Directory]

Re:
A ".nu" player on domain scene
"97% or so of .COM registrants are Americans." WRONG!
"a reasonable price tag"
Re: "Acceptance" of money
"Claiming" a TLD
"Clash" of site names
"First come first served" RULES!
"int" domain
"Internet governence"
Re: "Internet Names *and* Addresses"
Re: "Internet Names *and* Addresses"
Re: "Internet Names *and* Addresses"
Re: "Internet Names *and* Addresses"
Re: "Internet Names *and* Addresses"
Re: "Internet Names *and* Addresses"
Re: "Internet Names *and* Addresses"
"National" Registries
"Opting Out" (Re: The Price Of Admission is Acceptable.)
Re: "rights"
"Rough Consensus"
The "Statement of Principles"
Re: The "Statement of Principles"
Re: PAB Re: The "Statement of Principles"
Re: PAB Re: The "Statement of Principles"
Re: PAB Re: The "Statement of Principles"
Re: PAB Re: The "Statement of Principles"
Re: PAB Re: The "Statement of Principles"
Re: The "Statement of Principles" where/how to sign ?
Re: The "Statement of Principles"
Re: The "Statement of Principles"
Re: The "Statement of Principles"
Re: The "Statement of Principles"
Re: The "Statement of Principles"
Re: The "Statement of Principles"
Re: The "Statement of Principles"
Re: The "Statement of Principles"
"the great CORE meeting in Washington"
Re: "the great CORE meeting in Washington"
Re: "the great CORE meeting in Washington"
Re: "the great CORE meeting in Washington"
Re: "the great CORE meeting in Washington"
"The Internet does not need another single point of failure."
"U.S. hopes new Internet plan will appease critics"
Re: "Why expand the number of gtld's at all?"
Re: "Why expand the number of gtld's at all?"
Re:"Xenophobia"
#4 and Climing: The Internet Way!
Re: #4 and Climing: The Internet Way!
The $ Requirement of Running a Registry
$7M
Re: $7M
(fwd) .US domain managed by the Post office?
(fwd) AlterNIC founder faces extradition
(fwd) AlterNIC's Kashpureff Still Behind Bars
(fwd) BREAK-IN AT THE SRS
(Fwd) CWI article on IAHC
Re: (Fwd) CWI article on IAHC
Re: CWI article on IAHC
Re: CWI article on IAHC
Re: (Fwd) CWI article on IAHC
Re: (Fwd) CWI article on IAHC
(fwd) Fund created for Alternic founder
(fwd) Kashpureff: THE FUGITIVE (CBC TV Report)
Re: (fwd) Kashpureff: THE FUGITIVE (CBC TV Report)
(Fwd) Re: Nameserver registrations by lusers
(Fwd) The Canadian solution to domain name disputes
(fwd) U.S. Internet activist languishes in Canada jail
(Fwd) Use of Repository Data for Certain Purposes
(Fwd) What's in a domain?
(fwd)Kashpureff to face federal charges
(fwd)New domain names afoot
(Newbie Query)
(no subject)
(none)
(Original) Conflict resolution revisited
*** Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon)
Re: -discuss members
.AFRICA
.africa gTLD
Re: .africa gTLD
Re: .africa gTLD
Re: FW: .AFRICA TLD
Re: .COM and CORE
.COM mostly in North America?
Re:.com should remain 'geographically central' to NorthAmerica?
Re:.com should remain 'geographically central' toNorthAmerica?
Re:.com should remain 'geographically central'toNorthAmerica?
Re:.com should remain 'geographicallycentral'toNorthAmerica?
Re: .COM TLD, DNS and the English Language
.dog
Re: .erotica or .sex ? Magaziner says _no way_.
.eu and .eur
RE: .eur anyone?
.FCN .WTV Top Level Domain Name Claim
.FCN alpha Domain Name Registry
.FCN Free Community Network (Re: Shared vs. Exclusive)
RE: .LATIN TLD
Re: The .ly Domain (was Re: HouseTestimony of Andrew Sernovitz)
.ly: Letter from the UK Government Department of Trade andIndustry
Re: .MALL Top Level Domain
.proj
Re: .rec, .arts etc
Re: .web
.WEB = IODesign
Re: .WWW has a prior claim (Re: .web)
10,000? 1,000. (was_Re: First come/First served)
1000 Times Stronger than Vitamin C & Pycnogenol!
28 Registrars and Questions
Re: 2ld's vs. 3ld's
Re: 2nd Civil Discourse
3 Weeks Late (and counting . . .)
Re: 51% of domain registrants are not Americans
60 day period
The 60 day publication period.
60 day reading materials
60 Day thing resend
60 day thought
60 Day Wait
Re: 60 Day Wait (fwd)
Re:60 Day wait..NSI case history
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period
Re: 60 day waiting period -- look at the facts!
Re: 60 day waiting period -- look at the facts!
Re: 60 day waiting period -- look at the facts!
Re: 60 day waiting period -- look at the facts!
Re: 60 day waiting period -- look at the facts!
Re: 60 day waiting period -- look at the facts!
Re: 60 day waiting period.... a suggestion ...
Re: 60 day waiting period.... a suggestion ...
Re: 60 day waiting period.... a suggestion ...
Re: 60 day waiting period.... a suggestion ...
60 day waiting peroid.
Re: 60 day waiting peroid.
Re: 60 day waiting peroid.
Re: 60 day waiting peroid.
Re: 60 day waiting peroid.... a suggestion ...
Re: 60 day waste
60 days - Solving Trademark/Domain Name conflict.
60-day wait and repository
Re: 60-day waste period?
60? day dissemination period
71% or so of .COM registrants are Americans: Right!
Re: 71% or so of .COM registrants are Americans:Right!
Re: [ GIG-TALK ] Is the gTLD-MoU a fait accompli?
Re: [ GIG-TALK ] Re: Tiered DNS Democracy
Re: [ GIG-VOTE ] authentication vs nomination
Re: [ RSCTALK ] TLD Nominations
[apnic-talk] Re: Funny. The White Paper confirms most speculations!
Re: [apnic-talk] RE: White Paper follow up
[brian@hursley.ibm.com: IAB statement on US Government White Paper]
[Fwd: [ispc-list] US Domain Future Developments (fwd)]
[Fwd: closed One Project. One PAB. One List]
[Fwd: DNSO Important update: The "Merged" Draft]
Re: [Fwd: DNSO Status Report and Draft Bylaws Changes]
[Fwd: DRAFT Version of the IPv8 TLDs]
[Fwd: Fw: IETF enemies ?]
[Fwd: IAHC Root Servers ?]
[Fwd: PAB marketing suggestion]
[Fwd: PAB Opens Mailing List]
[Fwd: Re: A long strange trip]
[Fwd: Re: A question about protocol]
[Fwd: Re: Dividing the work...]
[Fwd: Re: gTLD-MoU News (August 22, 1997)]
[Fwd: Re: Hudson & Associates "Hudson's Solution" RE. tm.x]
[Fwd: Re: Hypothesis -- Mr. Jeff Williams is a Teenager.]
[Fwd: Re: People mass-purchasing domains]
[Fwd: Re: STOP gTLD-MoU]
Re: [Fwd: Re: Trademark Disputes]
[Fwd: Re: TradeMarks classification works, and also ".tm" TLD]
[Fwd: Re: Warehousing, TM violations & the new gTLD's]
[Fwd: Re: Who Am I? (or whoami? in BSDese)]
[Fwd: The authors thank Jeff Williams...]
[Fwd: two new root only servers]
[Fwd: UFN paths given in a browser type environment.]
[Fwd: UN to issue net controls????]
Re: [fwd] United States, EU differ on global standards for the Net
Re: [FYI] Shared Top Level Domain Mailing List Info
Re: [ifwp] Jeff Williams' FAQ (was Re: About Bind...
Re: [ifwp] Re: Full text Comparison of Bylaws Proposals
Re: [INTA] Trademarks and Domain Names
[Oz-ISP] Action over the Bill (fwd)
[Submission] Existing TLD Applications
[Third Revised Draft] of Substantive Guidelines for ACPs Now Available
About the personnal domains
Academic Roots and Solutions for the Internet
ACRONYMANIACS!
Actioneer wanted for Domain MICHIGAN.COM
Re: addendum to the gTLD MoU / Lack Of Credibility?
Re: addendum to the gTLD MOU: phase 1: building a list
Adding two letters and a dot renders unoffensive?
Additional Contributions Published on IAHC Web Site
Additonal top level domain name suggestions...
Advertisement: Website Hosting
Re: Advertising on WHOIS
Re:africa gTLD
AGN-DNS EARTH/USA Registry Terms and Conditions FIRST DRAFT
RE: AGN-DNS EARTH/USA Registry Terms and Conditions FIRST DRAFT
Re: AGN-DNS EARTH/USA RegistryTerms and Conditions FIRST DRAFT
Alan Kay's opinion on TLD's
Re: An alternative to the "lottery"
An alternative to the lottery
AlterNIC cofounder ready for trial
altRFC
altRFC on New Top Level Domain Name Registration
altRFC: http://www.fcn.net/altrfc.html
Re: Altruistic Registries?
AMERICA'S ONLY ANTI-MONOPOLY JOURNAL
Fw: American Registry for Internet Numbers (fwd)
And now, something completely different
Another approach to domain name stability
Another Domain Name Trademark Dispute Goes to Court
Re: Another Introduction
Another lurker chimes in
Another update
Re: Anti Capitalism?
Re: Anti-monopoly Fervor Distorts Interagency DNS Working
Anti-monopoly Fervor Distorts Interagency DNS Working Group Process*
Re:Anti-monopoly Fervor Distorts Interagency DNS Working Group
Re: Anti-monopoly Fervor Distorts Interagency DNS Working Group Process*
Re:Anti-monopoly Fervor DistortsInteragency DNS Working Group
anti-mou people
anticompetitive activty
Any past examples??
Apparent Fraud: Domain Name Survey
Application for PAB/POC maybe?
application-based gTLDs
Re: Applications and Public Trust (was Re: Expansion of the IAHC)
Re: Are domain names sold or leased? (Re: Is domain name property? Round 2.)
Re: Are domain names sold or leased? (Re: Is domain name property? Round 2.)
Are There Other TLD Lists?
Re: ARGH! Off Topic ... Re: Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
Re: ARGH! Off Topic ... Re: Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
An argument against Shared TLDs
Article in Government Lawyer about NSI's domain name policy
As a side note
At the drop of a hat (The definition of INTERNET)
Re: Attack on CORE SRS
Re: Attempts to democratize the MoU
ATTENTION flamers
Re: ATTENTION ISOC MEMBERS . . .
Re: Authentication Cops and Wobbers
Availability of aggregate repository data
Avoiding Lawsuits
Back end functions
Back to the drawing board
Bad Logic
Bashing US courts (Re: root servers (Re: NSI))
Be advised
The Bermuda Triangle of the Internet
RE: A Better Idea
The Black and Blue Ribbon IETF
bob is well known on alt.usenet.kooks
Bob's 100% Official IAHC InFaq
Break in Hostilities
Breaking news - 2Day's World Domain News!
Re: By the way...
Re: Call for (R) trademark domain(s)
A CALL TO DNR! http://www.fcn.net/xindex.html http://www.fcn.net/xindex.html
Re: Can NSI add new roots? (Was: Emergent Press Conference)
Re: Can NSI add new roots? (Was: Emergent Press Conference)
Re: Can NSI add new roots? (Was: EmergentPress Conference)
Canada's CORE Monopoly?
Re: The Canadian solution to domain name disputes
Carl Oppedahl
Cartel
The case of www.playmen.it
Re: Cato Institute on Domain Names
Re: Centralization and fragmentation
Certain Decisions made by gTLD Registrars
charter again accessible
Chartered TLDs
Re: Choosing gTLD Registrars
Re: civil discourse
Clarification
Re: Clarification please (was Re: Is stuttering the price to pa
Re: Clarification please (was Re: Is stuttering the price to pay?)
Clarification please: namespace ownership
A Clear Future
Re: Clinton Domain Name Plan Nears Completion
Coffee, Tea or Thai? (fwd)
A collective contribution
combined shared/private?
Comment on gTLD-MoU RFC 2: Review of new gTLDs
Comments of DNRC - Part II
Comments of Domain Name Rights Coalition - Part I
Comments on assorted drafts
Comments on Crispin draft
Comments on draft-iahc-gTLDspec-00
Comments on draft-iahc-gTLDspec-00 - Resend (Formatted)
Comments on Higgs
Comments on IAHC proposals
Re: Comments on IAHC proposals
Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU
Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU
Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU
Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU
Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU
Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU
Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU
Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU
Smear Campaign: ENOUGH!
Re: Smear Campaign: ENOUGH!
Re: Smear Campaign: ENOUGH!
RE: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU
controlling disinformation
Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU
Re: comments on Jim's and Jeff's addenda to the gTLD MOU
Comments on Karl's draft
Re: Comments on Karl's draft
Re: Comments on Karl's draft
Re: Comments on Karl's draft
Re: Comments on Karl's draft
Re: Comments on Karl's draft
Re: Comments on Karl's draft
Re: Comments on Karl's draft
Re: Comments on Karl's draft
Re: Comments on Karl's draft
Re: Comments on Karl's draft
Comments on Karp draft
YOU TOO CAN REACH 50 GAZILLION PEOPLE ON THE INTERNET!
Re: Comments on Karp draft
Re: Comments on Karp draft
Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft
Re: Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft
Re: Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft
Re: Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft
Re: Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft
Re: Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft
Re: Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft
Re: Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft
Re: Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft
Re: Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft
Re: Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft
Re: Comments on the Dec 19th IAHC draft
Re: comments on the draft specifications for administration and
comments on the draft specifications for administration and management of gTLDs by cnNIC
Commerce department Requrinments Munitions
Commerce Driven
Re: Commerce Subcommittee Hearings
Commercial Endeavor
Comparing 800 Number/TLD Shared Database
Competition between new registrars
con men
con men?
Conditional Signing of the MoU? (Re: The Price Of Admission is Acceptable.)
Confirmed -- Mr. Jeff Williams is a Fake
Conflict of Interests (fwd)
Conflict resolution?
Re: Conflict resolution? Where is the CHANNEL?
Confused
Confused?
Congradulations
Congress studies domain future (fwd)
consensus and the 60-day issue
Consensus Development
Content? Issues?
CORE
CORE == Big Brother ??
RE: CORE == Big Brother ??
RE: CORE == Big Brother ??
RE: CORE == Big Brother ??
Re: CORE == Big Brother ??
CORE database requirements
CORE DUMPS DNS PLAN? Hummmmm?
Re:CORE exists states Allisat!
CORE fomed...and working
CORE Implementations
Re: CORE is innocent
CORE Nonsense
Core Options
Core priceing
CORE problem report form
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
Re: CORE Show Stopper
CORE vs. InterNIC
Re: CORE vs. InterNIC
Re: CORE vs. InterNIC
Re: CORE vs. InterNIC
Re: CORE vs. InterNIC
Re: CORE vs. InterNIC
Re: CORE vs. InterNIC
Re: CORE vs. InterNIC
Re: CORE vs. InterNIC
Re: CORE vs. InterNIC
Re:core/ietf
Re:core/ietf
Re:core/ietf
CORE: Gone Mad Take Over THE WORLD DNRmaniacs!
CORE: Noble Self-Imollation
Core:GP is U.S.-Centric.. + Irving says..
Re: Core:GP is U.S.-Centric.. + Irving says..
Correction
corrupt swine
Reasoned debate requires reasonable statements
Re: Reasoned debate requires reasonable statements
Re: Reasoned debate requires reasonable statements
Cost of evaluation
Re: Cost of evaluation
RE: Cost of evaluation
Re: Cost of evaluation
Country Code TLDs
Re: Country Code TLDs
Re: Country Code TLDs
Re: Country Code TLDs
Re: Country Code TLDs
RE:Crazy Ideas about GTLD-MOU
Crazy Ideas about GTLD-MOU Processes
The criteria for a good naming system
A Critical Crossroads
Re: Crocker - crok!
Current status of TLDs?
Re: Current status of TLDs?
RE: Current status of TLDs?
Current submissions
customers "belonging" to NSI
Re: customers "belonging" to NSI
Re: customers "belonging" to NSI
Re: customers "belonging" to NSI
cutting down the extraneous traffic
The Cyber-banana Republic of The Internet
Database Public ?
databases and authentication.
Re: databases and authentication.
Re: Dave Crocker ratifies the IAHC/CORE process as restrictive and self directed.
Re: Dave Crocker ratifies the IAHC/CORE process as restrictive and self directed.
Re: Dave Crocker ratifies the IAHC/CORE process as restrictive and self directed.
De-Wheel the CORE Bandwagon!
Re: Death of Net predicted... (Was_Re: 10,000? 1,000. etc)
Debate climate
Dec 19 draft up/down
December IETF
DECLARATION (Re: New TLDs and Registry charters)
Re: DECLARATION (Re: New TLDs and Registry charters)
dee3 comments on IAHC 19 dec draft
User's Viewpoint re: Eastlake comments
Re: User's Viewpoint re: Eastlake comments
Re: dee3 comments on IAHC 19 dec draft
Re: dee3 comments on IAHC 19 dec draft
Re: dee3 comments on IAHC 19 dec draft
Re: .africa gTLD
DELETE (Re: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries !!!)
Delusion is an illness
Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries !!!
Re: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries !!!
Re: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries!!!
Re: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries !!!
Re: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries !!!
Re: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries !!!
Re: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries!!!
RE: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries !!!
RE: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries !!!
Re: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries !!!
Re: Democratically Elected Management for the New Registries !!!
Democraty !
Re: Democraty !
Re: Democraty !
Re: Democraty !
Re: Democraty !
Re: Democraty !
DESIST (Re: The IANA's File of iTLD Requests)
Re:Despite Disaster Zealots Continue to Convert The Unseuspecting
Details for gTLD Shared Repository informal meeting
Re: Details for gTLD Shared Repository informal meeting
The dice are thrown
Re: The dice are thrown
Re: The dice are thrown
Re: The dice are thrown
Re: The dice are thrown
Re: The dice are thrown
RE: Did Dyson Report Arrive Okay?
Re: [ RSCTALK ] RE: Did Dyson Report Arrive Okay?
Re: [ RSCTALK ] RE: Did Dyson Report Arrive Okay?
different view
Re: different view
Re: different view
re: different views
re: different views
re: different views
re: different views -2
Re: different views -3
Directory Services A Great Help
Re: Directory Services A Great Help
Re: Directory Services A Great Help
Re: Directory Services A Great Help
Re: Directory Services A Great Help
Directory Services and Domain Registries.
Re: Directory Services and Domain Registries.
Re: Directory Services and Domain Registries.
Re: Disclosure (was Re: What doubt? What benefits?)
Re: Disclosure (was Re: What doubt? What benefits?)
Re: Disclosure (was Re: What doubt? What benefits?)
Re: Disclosure (was Re: What doubt? What benefits?)
Re: Disclosure (was Re: What doubt? What benefits?)
Re: Disclosure (was Re: What doubt? What benefits?)
Re: Disclosure (was Re: What doubt?What benefits?)
DISMISS ITU's TARJANNE: AN OPEN LETTER
Re: DISMISS ITU's TARJANNE: AN OPEN LETTER
Re: DISMISS ITU's TARJANNE: AN OPEN LETTER
Re: DISMISS ITU's TARJANNE: AN OPEN LETTER
Re: Disney
Disposition of the TLD applications made to the IANA
Dispute resolution
Re: Dispute resolution (fwd)
Dispute resolution - followup
Re: DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN CYBERSPACE:
RE: Disputes ... - Much ado for nothing?
Re: Disputes about person names
RE: Disputes with registrars vs disputes with CORE
Distracting ourselves successfully
Re:DNS and Directory
Re: DNS and Directory Services
Re: DNS and Directory Services (hierarchy, translation of)
DNS Conference Speech
DNS Conference Summary
dns hearing (fwd)
dns hearing the wired perspective
dns meeting with magaziner
DNS Peace TLD Consensus
DNS Security
DNS: Does CORE stand for an open or for a closed Internet?
Re: DNS: Does CORE stand for an open or for a closed Internet?
Re: DNS: The "Common Sense Concept"
DNSO APPLICATION TIMETABLE
Re: Does Jeff Williams Exist?
Domain Auctioneer Wanted
Re: Domain hijacking
Domain Name Grabbing (fwd)
Re: Domain Name Rights Coalition
The Domain Name Rights Coalition's response
Re: Domain Names
Domain Names and Directories
Domain Names are like new Trademark classes, separated class for each TLD
Domain names hit the main stream
Re: Domain names x Trademarks conflicts - We need a separated ".tm" TLD
Domain names x Trademarks conflicts - We need a separated ".tm" TLD - Ben02
Re: Domain names x Trademarks conflicts - We need a separated...
The Domain Ouroboros
Re: DOMAIN REG
Domain-name warrior held after Canada hearing
re: don heath's comments
DON'T TREAD ON US (Re: Your cards...)
DON'T TREAD ON US...
Double Jeopardy (Re: What doubt? What benefits?)
Doubled mail messages, hopefully fixed
Draft
Draft-denninger-02
draft-postel
Draft?
eager children
Earth To Internic: Come in Internic!
Economic Fascism and the gTLD MoU
EEK In Custody... Canada buckles to Uncle Sam. Again.
EEKs, SIPs, and the DNS
Re: elvis@graceland.com
elvis@graceland.com: Re: Postel's Draft
Re: Emergent and the SRS
Emergent Press Conference
The end of DNS as we know it
Enough
Enquiry on InterNIC's registration statistics
Esta es una prueba, si desea borrela sin leer
ETA Killers
Re: ETSI vs. Magaziner whose interests? (was) RE: CORE == Big Brother ??
Eugene got what he deserved
Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
Re: Europe Using IAHC to Control Internet?
European-wide TLD
EVEN HOTTER: http://www.fcn.net/xxx/ (correction!)
Everyone Cares...
Re: Everyone's Invited
The Evolution
Exclusionary Process
Exclusive License
Re: Exclusivity
exclusivity of TLD's
existing.com and .tm.us
Re: Expansion of the IAHC
Re: Expansion of the IAHC
Re: Expansion of the IAHC
Re: Expansion of the IAHC
RE: Expansion of the IAHC
Re: Expansion of the IAHC
Re: Expansion of the IAHC
RE: Expansion of the IAHC
RE: Expansion of the IAHC
RE: Expansion of the IAHC
RE: Expansion of the IAHC
RE: Expansion of the IAHC
RE: Expansion of the IAHC
ISP viewpoint
Expansion of the IAHC (fwd)
Re: Expansion of the IAHC (fwd)
Re: Expansion of the IAHC (fwd)
Re: Expansion of the IAHC (fwd)
Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else)
Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else)
Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else)
Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else)
Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else)
Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else)
Re: Fallacy of hindsight again (was something else)
Famous marks and the Draft
Re: Famous marks and the Draft
Re: Famous marks and the Draft
Re: Famous marks and the Draft
Re: Famous marks and the Draft
FAQ -- Jeff Williams
Re: FAQ -- Jeff Williams
Re: FAQ -- Jeff Williams
Re: FAQ -- Jeff Williams
Re: FAQ -- Jeff Williams
Farber on self-governance
Re: Farber on self-governance
Re: Farber on self-governance
Re: Farber on self-governance
Re: Farber on self-governance
Re: Fast Food Analogy
Re: FCFS 101, was (Re: Is domain name property? Round 2.
FCFS: Clarification
FCN.NET, ML.ORG, EU,ORG: Free DNR
Fees
A few comments
Few ideas on preliminary global registry
Filling the registrar application form.
Final Applications
FINAL WORDS: ON .WTV & .FCN
firestorm
Re: firestorm
Re: firestorm
Re: firestorm
RE: firestorm
Re- firestorm
Re: firestorm
Re: First come/First served
First DNSO Organisational meeting
Re: First? TRUE Root Name Server On Line
Five more join NSI's Premier Domain servi ce
FLASH: One DNS user likes the draft
FLORIDA AIR ONLY $99 RETURN!!!
Follow the bouncing list names
Food for thought..
Re: For your amusement..
For your Information , important event on the Internet next year.
Re: Forbidden!
Form: Greeting Soundvision - Cloaked
RE: The formerly controversial sentence in the "Statement of Prin cipl es"
RE: The formerly controversial sentence in the "Statement of Principl es"
The formerly controversial sentence in the "Statement of Principles"
Four Minor Internet Clubs Support Anti-trust monopoly over NewDomains, Restricting Registration System, and Hiding Jon Postel/IANA adISOC behind Swiss law to boot! Over our dead, dismembered and otherwisemutilated bodies!
A Four Point Plan for DNS Management
Re: Four to One
The Fragility of the Internet (Re: Is domain name property? Round 2.)
Framework for IAHC proposals
Re: Free Market on fresh new TLD business
Free Registration
FREE SOFTWARE !!!
Free Tip
Free Water Test
Free Web Space and Authoring for Historical Societies
free.nic (was_Re: First come/First served)
Re: free.nic (was_Re: First come/First served)sh ns.eu.org cat .signature
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: THE LIMIT TO TRADEMARKS
Freedom To Choose
FreeNIC,AlterNIC,InterNIC,AnyNIC: ALL EQUAL (Re: Hijacked Domain Names?)
Freenic: Co-operative, Non-Profit, Shared International Registry
From APNIC, announcment on WP
From Jail and Boardroom, A Street Fight for the Internet
Fuel on the fire
Fwd to GTLD list from Domain policy
Re: FYI
Re: FYI (I wonder where the security is now?)
Re: FYI (I wonder where the security is now?)
An FYI for WP working group
RE: An FYI for WP working group
FYI: some more data on privacy concerns with the whois data
Re: FYI: some more data on privacy concerns with the whois data
Re: Gabe Battista says... (was Re: 60 Day wait..NSI case history)
Generic domain names
Re: Generic domain names
Re: Generic domain names
Re: Generic domain names
Re: FCFS
Generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD-MOU) Technical Meeting
Re: Generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD-MOU) Technical Meeting
Geographic/Regional gTLDs
Re: Geographic/Regional gTLDs
Geographically delimited names
Getting back to the topic at hand...
Re: Getting back to the topic at hand...
Re: Getting back to the topic at hand...
Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?
Re: PAB Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?
Re: PAB Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?
Re: Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?
Re: Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?
Re: Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?
Re: Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?
Re: Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?
Re: Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?
Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?
Re: Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?
RE: Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?
GOLD NOTHING GLOBAL ETHER
Re: GOLD NOTHING GLOBAL ETHER
Re: GOLD NOTHING GLOBAL ETHER
Good Monopolies
Re: Good Monopolies
Re: Good Monopolies/Bad Monopolies
Re: Good Monopolies/Bad Monopolies
Re: Good Monopolies/Bad Monopolies
Re: Good Monopolies/Bad Monopolies
Good Monopolies
Re: Good Monopolies
RE: Good Monopolies
Re: Good Monopolies
Re: Good Monopolies/Bad Monopolies
Re: Good Monopolies/Bad Monopolies
Re: Good Monopolies/Bad Monopolies
Re: Good Monopolies/Bad Monopolies
Re: Good Monopolies/Bad Monopolies
Re: Good Points
got 50 old mails what hapened
gp comments processing info requested
Re: gp comments processing info requested
Re: gp comments processing info requested
Re: gp comments processing info requested
Re: GP, FR notice, roots, etc
Re: Grass Roots Servers
Great weekend
Re: Great weekend
Great...
Re: Great...(List, Applications)
New TLDs and Registry charters
More on New TLDs and Registry charters
Re: New TLDs and Registry charters
Re: Greed (was: Re: First come/First served)
Greetings
Re: gTLD MOU/CORE rollout date?
gTLD Shared Repository informal meeting
gTLD Shared Repository meeting
gTLD's
gTLD-MoTMU Price of Admission
gTLD-MoU coup de grace
gTLD-MoU News (August 22, 1997)
gTLD-MoU News (August 27, 1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (December 10, 1997)
gTLD-MoU News (January 15, 1998)
gTLD-MoU News (June 10, 1998)
gTLD-MoU News (June 12, 1998)
FYI: "Private Sector Will Take Up Domain Plan"
Re: FYI: "Private Sector Will Take Up Domain Plan"
gTLD-MoU News (July 9, 1998)
gTLD-MoU News (July 9, 1998)
gTLD-MoU News (July 27, 1998)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (November 13, 1997)
gTLD-MoU News (November 21, 1997)
gTLD-MoU News (November 29, 1997)
gTLD-MoU News (November 29, 1997) - correction
gTLD-MoU News (December 10, 1997)
gTLD-MoU News (January 7, 1998)
gTLD-MoU News (December 16, 1997)
Re:gTLD-MoU News (November 4, 1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (November 4, 1997)
gTLD-MoU News (October 27, 1997)
re:gTLD-MoU News (October 27, 1997)
re:gTLD-MoU News (October 27, 1997)
Re:gTLD-MoU News (October 31, 1997)
Re:gTLD-MoU News (October 31, 1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31, 1997)
Re:gTLD-MoU News (October 31, 1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31, 1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31, 1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31, 1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31, 1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31,1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31,1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31,1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31,1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31,1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31,1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31,1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31,1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31,1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 31,1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 8, 1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October 8, 1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October31,1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (October31,1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (September 13, 1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News (September 13, 1997)
Re: gTLD-MoU News Announcements
Re: gTLD-MoU News Announcements
RE: gTLD-MoU News Announcements
Re: gTLD-MoU News Announcements
RE: gTLD-MoU News Announcements
RE: gTLD-MoU News Announcements
gTLD-MoU questions
gTLD-MoU Related News
gTLD-MoU Related News (August 19, 1997)
gtld-mou speack policy framework
gTLD-MoU Web Site
gTLD-MoU News
Re: gTLD-MoU News
Re: gTLD-MoU Web Site
Re: gTLD-MoU Web Site
Re: gTLD-MoU Web Site
Re: gTLD-MoU Web Site
Re: gTLD-MoU Web Site
Guarded objects
Re: Guarded objects
Re: Guarded objects
Re: Guarded objects
Happy New Year
Have a happy and safe Thanksgiving
FW: Heath problems with IAHC
Re: Heath problems with IAHC
Re: Heirarchical DNS ?!?!?!
Here is my Draft Proposal
Hey, check *THIS* out....
Re: Hey, check *THIS* out....
Re: Hey, check *THIS* out....
Re: Hey, check *THIS* out....
RE: Hey, check *THIS* out....
Re: Hijacked Domain Names--should be: Hijacked Network
Re: Hijacked Domain Names--should be: Hijacked Network
Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
RE: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
RE: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked Domain Names?
Re: Hijacked website (fwd)
Re: Hijacked website (fwd)
Re: Hijacked website (fwd)
Re: Hijacked website (fwd)
Re: Historic parallels (split perceptions)
Hoarding domain names
Re: Hoarding domain names
HOT! HOT! HOT! http://www.fcn.net/xxx
Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz
Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz
Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz
Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz
Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz
Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz
The .ly Domain (was Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz)
Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz
Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz
Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz
Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz
Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz
Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz
Re: House Testimony of Andrew Sernovitz
How big the domain name risk really is?
How CORE Can Contribute...
How does a 60-day waiting period promote URL stability? (was something else)
Re: How does a 60-day waiting period promote URL stability? (wassomething else)
How does it work in civil-law countries? (Was something else)
How does one "claim" a TLD?
Re: FW: How I learned to stop worrying and love the IAHC
How many domain name conflicts have there been? (was 60-day)
How many ISPs are there in the world?
RE: How many names have you presold, Antony ?
RE: How many sheep make a flock? [was: gTLd-Mou related News.....]
How many TLD's should there be?
How to become your own ______NIC (In four easy steps)
Re: How to improve the issue ...
how to solve TM collision
http://www.fcn.net/xxx/
http://www.ihac.net (Re: Applications and Public Trust (was Re: Expansion of theIAHC)
http://www.wtv.net/allisat (Was_Re: NSI's contract)
Hurst: An Obstruction to Peace (Re: [ GIG-TALK ] GovernmentAlready Exists. Apply it.)
Hyperbole Fervor Distorts Serious Reporting and Discussion about gTLDs
Hypothesis -- Mr. Jeff Williams is a Fake
Hypothesis -- Mr. Jeff Williams is a Teenager.
Re: Hypothesis -- Mr. Jeff Williams is a Teenager.
Re: Hypothesis -- Mr. Jeff Williams is a Teenager.
I don't think there will be any 60 day wait
Re: I don't think there will be any 60 day wait
FW: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-tld-whois-01.txt
I: unsubscribe
I: unsubscribe
I: unsubscribe
I: unsubscribe gtld-discuss
IAHC
Re: IAHC
Re: IAHC 'business' composition
Re: IAHC 'business' composition
Re: IAHC 'business' composition
Re: IAHC archive [was Re: Comments on gTLD-MOU Leadership [was: Bob shaws misrepresentation of Jeff williams's comments]]
IAHC at San Jose
Re: IAHC at San Jose
RE: IAHC at San Jose
IAHC Comments please!
Comment(s).
Re: Comment(s).
Re: IAHC Comments please!
Re: IAHC Comments please!
Re: IAHC Comments please!
Re: IAHC Comments please!
Re: IAHC Comments please!
Re: IAHC Comments please!
Re: IAHC Comments please!
Re: IAHC Consensus
IAHC Draft Specification now available
IAHC Philosophy
Re: IAHC Philosophy
Re: IAHC Philosophy
IAHC Process
Re: IAHC Process
IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon)
Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon)
Re[2]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon)
RE: Re[2]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon)
Re[4]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon)
Re: Re[2]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon)
Re[4]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon)
Re: Re[2]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon)
Re: Re[2]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon)
Re: Re[4]: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon)
Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon)
Re: IAHC Proposal (Attacks Thereon)
Re: IAHC Proposal encourages domain name speculation? (was something else)
IAHC Self-Immolation (Re: Expansion of the IAHC)
Re: IAHC Self-Immolation (Re: Expansion of the IAHC)
IAHC's mixed playground.
iahc-discuss mail-list
IAHC: Exclusionary Process (Was-Re: Let the games begin)
Re: IAHC: Exclusionary Process (Was-Re: Let the games begin)
Re: IAHC: Exclusionary Process (Was-Re: Let the games begin)
Re: monoplistic practises
IAHC: Hot Potatoe
IANA Appointments to the POC (fwd)
IANA Hand-Off To ISOC? (Re: The IANA's File of iTLD Requests)
Re: IANA Hand-Off To ISOC? (Re: The IANA's File of iTLD Requests)
Re: IANA Hand-Off To ISOC? (Re: The IANA's File of iTLD Requests)
Re: IANA Inc. and ISOC "Inc."
Re: IANA Mail List
Re: IANA Mail List
Re: IANA Mail List
Re: IANA Mail List
Re: IANA Mail List
IANA mail list is back up now
IANA net.czar
The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
Re: The IANA Root as a National Park
The IANA's File of iTLD Requests
Re: IANA: Why Trademarks? (was Re: Emergent Press Conference)
Re: IANA: Why Trademarks? (was Re: Emergent Press Conference)
IC = Internet Correct
IETF attendees?
IETF BOF: LA, March 98
Re: IETF MAILING: REGISTERED ATTENDEES: December 9-13, 1996
IFWP Discussion draft
IFWP Juy 1-2 Procedural Proposal
IFWP Juy 1-2 Proposed Agenda
ignore test
IGTECH's proposal: a gTLD for individual users
Impending (?) entry of gTLD-MoU TLDs into the NSI roots
Implications of NSI "Skunkworks" Ruling
Re: Implications of NSI *Skunkworks* Ruling
Re: Implications of NSI *Skunkworks* Rul ing
Re: Implications of NSI *Skunkworks* Ruling
Important Message
improve signal-to-noise ratio here
improving format of "Immediate SLDs"
In a bad way. (Re: IAHC Philosophy)
In hopes of adding light as well as heat...
In Memory of Dr. Jonathan B. Postel, 1943-1998
In Sum
The Independent - London
Indepent view of the draft
Inet 97 - Call for speakers
Inflamatory irrelevant nonsense. PLEASE TITLE IT QUIBBLE.
Re: info
Info on NSI'srecent DNS system failure
Initial gTLD creation
Instructions for unsubscribing from iahc-discuss list
Re: Instruments and authority
Int'l diversity in iTLD Registries
Re: Int'l diversity in iTLD Registries
Re: Int'l diversity in iTLD Registries
Re: Int'l diversity in iTLD Registries
Re: Int'l diversity in iTLD Registries
Re: Int'l diversity in iTLD Registries
INTA releases draft policy on domain names and trademarks
Interesting Domain Name Trademark Dispute (fwd)
Re: Interesting Domain Name Trademark Dispute (fwd)
Re: Interesting Domain Name Trademark Dispute (fwd)
International Communications Policy
International Internet Commission
Re: International Internet Commission
International Internet Treaty
International Registries
Re: International Registries
Re: International Registries
Re: International Registries
Re: International Registries
Re[2]: International Registries
Internet Commission (SUBMISSION)
Internet Constitution
Re: Internet Constitution
INTERNET DEADBEATS
Internet DNS Forum - July 30-31
Internet Domain Name Plan Falters
Internet Governance
Re: Internet Governance
Re: Internet Governance
Re: Internet Governance
Re: Internet Governance
Re: Internet Governance
Re: Internet Governance & "Producers' Cooperatives"
Re: Internet Governance & "Producers' Cooperatives"
Re: Internet Governance & "Producers' Cooperatives"
Re: Internet Governance & "Producers' Cooperatives"
Internet Governance: Taking Stock
Internet Government (was_Re: Questions for Stakeholders)
Re: Internet Government (was_Re: Questions for Stakeholders)
Re: Internet Government (was_Re: Questions for Stakeholders)
Internet Government is *not* IANA
The Internet Power Grab and Peace
Internet rebel with a cause
Internet Society Election
Internet to heel? NEVER!
Internet voting (Re: POC membership [was : Re: The Price of Admission is...])
The Internet Way!
Internet: The Founding Convention
Re: InterNIC Reliability Issues <long>
InterNIC RFC Database (fwd)
InterNIC,
FWD: The InterNIC: a case study in bad database management
Interview with David Maher, iPOC Chair in Connected
intillectual property
Introducing myself prior to contribution
IP number allocations -- get out your CHECKBOOKS!
The Iperdome Addendum
Iperdome Announces World-Wide Visibility
Iperdome Prepares for Internet IPO
Re: Iperdome Press Release
Iperdome Press Release!
Re: Iperdome Press Release!
Re: Iperdome Press Release!
Re: Iperdome Press Release!
Re: Iperdome Press Release!
Re: Iperdome Press Release!
Re: Iperdome Press Release!
Iperdome's Addendum
Iperdome's response to the NOI
Re: FW: IPv8 and Regional Registries
Ira Magaziner delivers a Victory for the Internet
Ira speaks....
Irreconcilable Differances
Re: Irreconcilable Differances
Is 60 a magic number?
Re: Is domain name property? Round 2.
Re: Is domain name property? Round 2.
Re: Is domain name property? Round 2.
Re: Is domain name property? Round 2.
Re: Is domain name property? Round 2.
Re: Is domain name property? Round 3.
Is Freedom the Lowest Common Denominator?
Is IAHC doing enough for the people who have driven change?
Is IANA fit to lead the Internet Community?
Is possible create new TLDS???
Is shared generally agreed, then?
Re: Is shared generally agreed...NO!
Re: Is stuttering the price to pay?
Is this list down?
ISO 3166 namespace administration
Re: ISO 3166 namespace administration & Proposal
ISO 3166 recomendations.
Re: ISO 3166 recomendations.
Re: ISO 3166 recomendations.
Re: ISO 3166 TLDs
Re: ISO 3166 TLDs
Re: ISO 3166 TLDs
ISO 3166-based Top Level Domain Survey
Re: ISO 3166-based Top Level Domain Survey
RE: ISO 3166-based Top Level Domain Survey
RE: ISO 3166-based Top Level Domain Survey
RE: ISO 3166-based Top Level Domain Survey
RE: ISO 3166-based Top Level Domain Survey
RE: ISO 3166-based Top Level Domain Survey
ISO-3166 TLDs
Re: ISO-3166 TLDs
Re: ISO-3166 TLDs
Re: ISO-3166 TLDs
ISOC Press Release (fwd)
Re: ISOC Press Release (fwd)
Re: ISOC/IETF *ARE* International Bodies[was: PAB nIANA facts]
Re: ISP viewpoint
Re: ISPCON - Telage summary
ISPs *not* allowed (was ISPs as stakeholders)
Re: ISPs *not* allowed (was ISPs as stakeholders)
Re: ISPs *not* allowed (was ISPs as stakeholders)
Re: ISPs *not* allowed (was ISPs as stakeholders)
Re: ISPs as stakeholders
It is a matter of service!
It's called the Green Paper for a reason . . .
Re: ITAG: Not Another One!
its out ! get it :-)
Re: The ITU Bogeyman
Re: ITU Press Release: Council Endorses ITU Role in Internet Top Level Domain Names
ITU Press Release: Council Endorses ITU Role in Internet Top LevelDomain Names
Jeff Williams FAQ (was Re: what ICANN is up to)
Jeff Williams' anti-Warehousing idea (Re: Warehousing, TM violations & the new gTLD's)
Jeff Williams' Claims to 1998 (was Re: [ifwp] Re:Microsoft's new browser
Jeff Williams' FAQ (99/03) (was Re: Stakeholders ignored inSIngapore DNSO meeting
Jeff Williams' FAQ (99/04) (was Re: JW's identity )
Jeff Williams' FAQ (was Re: [ifwp] About Bind...
Jeff Williams' FAQ (was Re: Congratulations Jeff)
Jeff Williams' FAQ (was Re: Trademark Disputes
Jeff Williams' FAQ. (98/03) (was Re: Threat fromChristopher Ambler
Re: Jeff's Credibility is inblimished and perfucted
Jeff's Credibility is inblimished and perfucted (was Re: Hyperbole Fever Disturds Normal Speek
Re: Jim Dixon/Dave Crocker (orTweedledee/Tweedeldum)
Re: Jim Fleming: FW: Less Fuzzy
Re: Jim Welch paper
John Palmer
Re: Johnson, Farber, Maher and Cochetti
Join the Domain Policy list to discuss Internet governance
Judge Defers AlterNIC Action
Re: Jurisdiction and location of registry (Re: Emergent ...)
Just a thought
Re: JW Credibility (But who's counting?)
Kashpureff Defense Fund
Kashpureff DNS Protest: Right On Eugene!
Kashpureff Returns: Now The Fun Starts
Kent Krap-o-rama was More FlemSpam
The King is Dead! No More Kings Thanks Very Much...
Re: KIS ASS
Kooks Be Gone (Was_Re: Kashpureff DNS Protest: Right On Eugene!)
Lack Of Credibility?
languages and semantics
Lasers/Optics/Optical Tables - Save!
last mail but about poc
Lawyers on IAHC
Left-handed, occluded denture wearers unite! (was: Re: ITAG...)
Legal Challenges: STATUS ????
Re: Legal Issues
Re: legal override
Legal Solutions? (Re: Conflict resolution?)
RE: Legalese
Let A Million Flowers Blossum
Let the games begin
Let's talk about se.xxx
Liberty Happiness Independance
Light The Fire
Re: Limiting the number of registrars and gTLDs
Linguistic chaos
list maintanence
List of free Pre-registrars
re: list of TLD's
Long domain names got you down? Here's the solution.
A long strange trip
Long-term viability: telephone numbers as aliases
Re: Lost without Industry Associations or Specific Groups
Lottery
A Lurker's comments
mAd MaX? No! INTERNET COMMISSION.
Magaziner backs world Net charter
mailing list
major announcment from the POC?
Many TLDs, decentralized admininstration
Mapping (social) reality into Internet (was: Regional ITLDS & TLD inter-fact)
Re: matching versus searching
Meet Mark Hughes
Merry Christmas!
Re: Metapicture: we want the money
Metzger + IAHC = Skewed
The Metzger Factor (Re: Expansion of the IAHC)
Metzger, Crocker, Wesson... What is Going On Here?
Minute-taking
Minutes and miscellaneous...
minutes from the newdom BOF
Re: Minutes of July 30th Meeting at ISI (fwd)
Misleading AGAIN about 3rd world... (was: Re: CORE == Big Brother ??)
Missing Archives
Missing the point....
Re: moder.......
A modest proposal--add <trademark> tag to solve domain name problem
Money (Re: Is domain name property? Round 2.)
MONEYMAKER - Domain names
Fwd: monica-lewinsky.com
Re: monoplistic practises
Monopole is impossible
Re: Monopoly/Oligopoly
Re: Monopoly/Ologopoly
moo
Re: More FlemSpam
More info on Reports for Esther Dyson
More mud in the waters
More Registrars onboard
MoU = The Big Lie
MoU Accountability (was ISPs as stakeholders)
MoU contracts (Re: gTLD-MoU Related News (August 19, 1997))
MoU discussion tactics (Re: Short Sighted and Unauthoritive)
MoU's CORE and it's leaders intend to fragment The DNS
Mr Irvings General Principals and the MoU
Mr. Metzger? IAHC Credibilty?
Mr. Sernovitz
mr.heats testimony
MSNBC gets it Right!
Multiple addressing - The upcoming use of Virtual Website addressing - Ben03
multiple pre-registration
Multiple registrations by the same organziation and private registrations
The museum and heritage sectors
The museum and heritage sectors (proposal)
Re: My agenda
Re: My comments
Re: my posting to newdom@ar.com
My proposal
Re: My Take/Dec 19 draft
Re: NameSecure and bad business practice
NANC
Need for NSI forced policy change, was RE: Thread 2: 60-day issue
Need Positon Reports for Esther Dyson
Needed Clarification
Re: Nequity works!??
Netizen's Message
Re: Netly News
NetNames Policy Statement on new gTLDs
Netnames' Pope: Biassed?
Network Solutions Announces
Network Solutions' Response to IAHC Draft
New DNSO Draft Application Form
New Domain Name
New Domain Names
Re: New Expert Systems Software (credibility)
the new gTLD registrar hardware requirements.
New gTLDs in Root?
New lawsuit decision
New proposal from Karl Denninger
New proposal from Kent Crispin
New proposal from Ronald J. Fitzherbert
Re: New proposal from Simon Higgs
New proposal from Simon Higs
New proposals
Re: New subscriber to the newdom@vrx.net mailing list.
Re: New TLD's
RE: New TLDs and Registry charters
new TLDs by petition
New TLDS for Old Administrators
New to list
New Top Level Domain BOF@IETF-LA'98
New Top Level Domain Name BOF @ IETF
New Top Level Domains
New top level domains for nations (not countries)
newdom Agenda.
newdom BOF
newdom bof made the paper
newdom BOF minutes (again)
newdom BOF time change
Newdom Peace (was_Re: Sernovitz attack)
Newdom Peace BOF @ IETF 12/97
newdom: Play that funky music!
News Report: Where is USG Response?
Re: News update
Nicaraguan history lesson (Re: Sernovitz attack)
NIKE.BLOWS, DISNEY.SUCKS, MACDONALDS.MADCOW
No Interim Draft (was Re: Is shared generally agreed, then?)
No one has any comments/criticisms??
No Representation! (Re: IAHC 'business' composition)
No Subject
No taxation without representation
no, of meaningful domain names vs. no. of TLDs (Re: Policy and Technology (Was: What is the Private Sector?))
Nominet UK's submission to IAHC on their proposals
Non Profit versus For Profit
Re: non-technical argument
NOT GOOD ENOUGH (Re: Instructions for unsubscribing from iahc-discuss list)
Notes (fwd)
Re: Notes (fwd)
Re: Notes (fwd)
Re: Notes (fwd)
Re: Notes (fwd)
Re: Notes (fwd)
Re: Notes (fwd)
Nothing for everybody
Re: Nothing for everybody
Jeff Williams' FAQ (and Fantasies - 98/02) (was Re: Nothingfor everybody
Re: nothing new
Now it's .war
Now it's .xxx
Re: Now it's .xxx
Re: Now it's .xxx
Re: Now it's .xxx
Re: Now it's .xxx
Re: Now it's .xxx
Re: Now it's .xxx
Re: Now it's .xxx
Re: Now it's .xxx
Re: Now it's .xxx
Re: Now it's .xxx
Re: Now it's .xxx
.rec, .arts etc
NSF anouncment of intrest
The NSF view concerning CORE
NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Possible new gTLD names...
Re: .WEB counterargument
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI and delegation
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
Re: NSI
NSI Agreement
NSI gets sued an eighth time for threatening to cut off a domain name
NSI shareing .COM?
Re: NSI shareing .COM?
Re: NSI shareing .COM?
Re: NSI shareing .COM?
Re: NSI v. Clue (was: Trademarks, random strings, sharing, reserved words)
NSI's contract
Re: NSI's contract
Re: NSI's contract
Re: NSI's contract
Re: NSI's contract
Re: NSI's contract
Re: NSI's contract
Re: NSI's contract
Re: NSI's contract
NSI's handling of COM discussed in FCBA magazine
NSI's handling of COM panned in ABA magazine
Re: NSI's role in adding new roots
Re: NSI/NSF relationship
Re: NSI/NSF relationship
NUM.NET and the NUM TLD
Re: NUM.NET and the NUM TLD
Re: NUM.NET and the NUM TLD
Re: NUM.NET and the NUM TLD
RE: NUM.NET and the NUM TLD
Re: Number of Registries
Re: Number of Registries
Re: Number of Registries
An observation
Re: An observation
Re: An observation
Re: An observation
Re: An observation
Re: An observation
Re: An observation
Re: An observation
Re: An observation
Re: An observation
Re: An observation
Re: An observation
Re: An observation
RE: An observation
Re: An observation
Re: OFF TOPIC ==> Re: IAHC archive [was Re: Comments on gTLD-MOU Leadership [was: Bob shaws misrepresentation of Jeff williams's comments]]
Jeff Williams FAQ -- (was Re: OFF TOPIC ==> Re: IAHCarchive [was Re: Comments on gTLD-MOULeadership [was: Bob shawsmisrepresentation of Jeff williams's comments]]
Re: OFF TOPIC ==> Re: IAHC archive [was Re: Comments on gTLD-MOU Leadership [was: Bob shaws misrepresentation of Jeff williams's comments]]
Offensive words
Re: Okay, I'm "sorry"
Re: On IAHC
On Internet Governance: An Independent Blue Paper.
Open Letter
Re: Open Letter
Open Letter from WIPO to the Internet Community
An Open Letter to CORE Members
An Open Letter to the IAHC
RE: Open Letter to UNCLE SAM
Re: Open Letter to UNCLE SAM (Re: PRIOR USE (Re: Am I confused?
Open Letter to UNCLE SAM (Re: PRIOR USE (Re: Am I confused?)
An open message . . .
Open Process: Towards IANA II
The opening up of .com (WAS: PAB [Fwd: Ira speaks....])
Opentown proudly announces 50,000 membership Anniversary Giveaway Festival
Opinion Piece
Opposing Trademarks
other issues with IAHC draft
Our consensus doesn't decide anything
Ownership of IP space
P.S. Re: The Internet Way!
Re: PAB "internet domain name system" organisation ?
PAB (Re: 3 Weeks Late (and counting . . .))
PAB and IPOC Application Form
PAB Clinton Administration won't stop domain name registry plan (fwd)
PAB Clinton Domain Name Plan Nears Completion (fwd)
Re: PAB Congress May Legislate Domain Names
Re: PAB Congress May LegislateDomain Names
PAB CORE Created - Press Release (fwd)
RE: PAB Details for gTLD Shared Repository informal meeting
Re: PAB DNS hearings (fwd)
Re: PAB endorsement of IANA proposals
Re: PAB Global Incorporation Alliance Workshop?
Re: PAB Grass Roots Servers
Re: PAB gTLD Registrar Selection (October 21, 1997)
Re: PAB gTLD Registrar Selection (October 21,1997)
PAB Internet Society To US - Speak Up Or Hurt The Internet (fwd)
Re: PAB Names and mail lists
Re: PAB nIANA facts
Re: PAB Opens Mailing List
Re: Fenello opens his own kimono
Re: PAB Opens Mailing List
PAB Re: Update on gTLD Registrar Application Process -Reply
Re: PAB UPDATE 2Day's World Domain News
Re: PAB VOTE ON STRUCTURE
Re: PAB VOTE ON STRUCTURE
Re: PAB Vote Totals Revised Again
Re: PAB Vote Totals Revised Again
Re: PAB whats wrong with the lists?
PalmerOwns.The.Earth (:-))
Panavision, domain names and trademarks
Paper
Paper is out, electrons are in
Re: Paper is out, electrons are in
Paragraph 2f
Fwd: Re: Paragraph 2f
Part of the open process?
RE: Part of the open process?
Re: Peace (Re: CYBERCRAP Was: Re: CYBERJACK !!)
Jeff William's Comments
PEACE - NEGOTIATION - CONSENSUS
re: Peace: (Was Jeff Williams and his fantasies)
Re: Peace: (Was Jeff Williams and his fantasies)
Re: Bullshit walks.
Re: Peace: (Was Jeff Williams and his fantasies)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re
Re: Peace: (Was Jeff Williams and his fantasies)
Re: People mass-purchasing domains
Re: The perception of the truth.
Re: The perception of the truth.
Re: The perception of the truth.
PERFECT FIESTA BOWL RESORT
Perhaps definitions are in order...
Re: Perhaps definitions are in order...
Perry's Arrogance
Re: Perry's Arrogance
Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
Re: Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
Re: Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
Re: Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
Re: Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
Re: Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
Re: Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
Re: Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
Re: Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
Re: Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
Re: Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
Re: Personal Attacks, Power, and the PAB
Personal Feuds
Re: Personal Feuds
Re: Personal Feuds
Re: Personal Feuds
Re: Personal Feuds
Re: Personal Feuds
Re: Personal Feuds
Re: Personal Feuds
Re: Personal Feuds
RE: Personal Feuds
RE: Personal Feuds
Re: FW: Petitioning Root Name Servers
Plan Ahead - Think Big !
Re: Plan Ahead - Think Big !
Re: Plan Ahead - Think Big !
Re: Plan Ahead - Think Big !
Re: Plan Ahead - Think Big !
Play That Funky Music NetSol!
Please correct a missing NOT on previos email
Please Help
Please make other top level domains available, SOON!
Re: Please make other top level domains available, SOON!
Re: Please make other top level domains available, SOON!
Re: Please make other top level domains available, SOON!
Re: Please make other top level domains available, SOON!
please remove me from the list
POC Member Speaks!
Re: POC Member Speaks!
Re: POC Member Speaks!
POC membership [was : Re: The Price of Admission is...]
POC: Delaware, USA Inc.?
Police the World?
Re: Policy and Technology (Was: What is the Private Sector?)
Pope Says Alternic/Worldnic/Freenic/CORE Are Eqaul & Legitimate!(?)
A position paper
Re: A position paper
Re: A position paper
Re: A position paper
Tally of 3 to 1 (Was Re: A position paper)
Re: A position paper
Re: A position paper
Re: A position paper
Re: A position paper
Re: A position paper
Re: A position paper
Re: A position paper
Re: A position paper
Re: A position paper
Re: A position paper
Re: A position paper
The possibility to choose
Re: The possibility to choose
Re: Possible new gTLD names...
Re: Possible new gTLD names...
Re: Possible new gTLD names...
Re: Possible new gTLD names...
Re: Possible new gTLD names...
Re: Possible new gTLD names...
Re: Possible new gTLD names...
Re: Possible new gTLD names...
Re: Possible new gTLD names...
Re: Possible new gTLD names...
Re: Possible new gTLD names...
Postel & Kashpureff: Frick and Frack
Re: Postel & Kashpureff: Frick and Frack
Re: Postel & Kashpureff: Frick and Frack
Postel Interview: A Call to Revolt?
Re: Postel's draft
RE: Postel's draft
Re: Postel's Draft
Re: Postel's Draft
RE: Postel's Draft
RE: Postel's Draft
Re: Postel's Draft
Re: Postel's Draft
Re: Postel's Draft
Re: Postel's Draft
RE: Postel's Draft
RE: Postel's Draft
POSTEL: ANSWER THE QUESTIONS!
Re: POSTEL: ANSWER THE QUESTIONS!
Re: POSTEL: ANSWER THE QUESTIONS!
Postel: Insurrection Inc.
Re: Postel: Insurrection Inc.
Postel: Right Wing DNS Terrorist
poster dist (again)
Re: poster dist (again)
Re: poster dist (again)
Re: poster dist (again)
Re: poster dist (again)
Re: poster dist (again)
TLD charters
Re: poster dist (again)
Re: poster dist (again)
Re: poster dist (again)
Re: poster dist (again)
Pre-registration or trademark theft?
Re: Pre-registration or trademark theft?
Press Information on Emergent Agreement
Re: Press Information on EmergentAgreement
Press Release
Press Release Fron down under.
A Preview - Iperdomes Response to the NOI
Re: The Price Of Admission is Acceptable.
Re: The Price Of Admission is Acceptable. (fwd)
Re: The Price Of Admission is Acceptable. Un!
The Price Of Admission. too low
The Price Of Admission. Unacceptable.
Re: Prior Use
PRIOR USE (Re: Am I confused?)
PRIOR USE (was_Re: Now it's .xxx)
Privatization Works!
Re: Privatization Works! -Reply & Flame
Re: Problems on changing the server.
Problems with draft formats
Problems with limits
Problems with section 5
procedure for applying
process questions
ProDomains' list of names
Re: Profit Motive
Proposal
Proposal & Press release updates
Fwd: Proposal for Discussion
Proposal One: Class B TLDs
Proposal re shared domain management
Proposal to Int'l Ad Hoc Committee
Proposal Two: Sample Meta Registrar
Proposals
Proposals
Re: Proposals
Re: Proposals
RE: Proposals
Proposals
RE: Proposals
Re: Proposals
Proposals
Proposals
proposed change in IAHC proposal wording re 60-day period
Re: proposed change in IAHC proposal wording re 60-day period
Protest proposed phone company Internet charges
Re: Protest proposed phone company Internet charges
RE: [IFWP] Protest proposed phone company Internet charges
Re: Protest proposed phone company Internet charges
Re: Protest proposed phone company Internet charges
Re: Protest proposed phone company Internet charges
Re: Protest proposed phone co