Kent; > I think everybody is waiting to see if the IFWP turns to dust, or > whether it should be seriously considered. The emerging feeling (I > won't use the word consensus) seems to be that the IFWP should be > seriously considered. There is no doubt that it will be an important > voice. Wrong. As the WP is unimportant, IFWP is, too, unimportant. Masataka Ohta