PAB Re: your mail

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Thu, May 21, 1998 at 11:27:39AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> 
> The MoU itself makes no such representation. In any case, this is not
> a matter for the entire PAB. I would suggest you take it to the
> officers.

Indeed, the MoU takes no representation, nor do any of the associated
documents, nor does PAB.  In fact, as we all know, PAB is explicitly 
a publically readable forum.  Further, the NTIA proceedings were 
required by the ex parte rules to be explicitly public.

However, as a courtesy to Mr Dellheim I have edited out his personal
email address from all PAB correspondence to date.  I have informed
him that I will not do this for any future correspondence -- the PAB
list is a publically readable list, and all submissions to it are
explicitly to be a part of the public record.

-- 
Kent Crispin, PAB Chair			"No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com			the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint:   B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44  61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html