Re: PAB Proposal for support of IANA.

["William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson@greendragon.com>]

> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 01:56:00 -0700
>   significant power would be a much jucier target than PAB, and
                                      juicier
>   implementation of such an organization must proceed very cautiously.
>
I am not convinced that any membership organization would be acceptable
to the dissenters, and certainly not PAB.  Originally, it was to have
been ISoc.  But maybe we can come up with a new iteration of the MoU.
Whether or not it has a membership fee, I would expect _some_ legal
document to bind the members.

Please put some text in opposing direct membership with proxies (rather
than a User/Industry Supporting organization).

Anyway, I got the IETF plenary to give a standing ovation to the draft
IANA plan....   We have momentum going!

WSimpson@UMich.edu
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32