RE: WIPO and ccTLDs (Was: RE: PAB Spam or Scam?)

["Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>]

At 03:49 11/11/98 -0500, Antony Van Couvering wrote:
>Bob,
>
>Thanks for replying.
>
>As you know, some things are amenable to regulation, and some are better
>handled by the marketplace.  Indeed, this is the balance the gTLD-MoU tried
>to achieve with its tripartite structure, and I support it because I think
>the correct balance was achieved.  One excellent decision by the IAHC was to
>leave ccTLDs out of it.
>
>I would like to know what activities of .CC you consider irresponsible, and
>what you think should be regulated.  I personally think that the basis for
>these sorts of objections haven't been thought through very well.
>
>It's ironic, from oh so many perspectives, that CORE is now being slammed
>(again) in the lists for not regulating its registrars, and allowing them to
>act irresponsibly.  Go figure.

Dear Antony:

Fortunately, Bob Sharp responded to your inquiry and I passed it along this
morning.

What do we need to say after we say the FAX piece was deceptive.

I understand your sensitivities, what with your new involvement with IATLD.

Regards,
BobC