Re: PAB comments on DNSO application

["Rick H. Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>]

kent,

I would like to make sure that the meeting mentioned below is electronic,
i believe that most of the DNSO process has been preformed by F2F meeting
and not that much is paid to the electronuic portion, i can not express
the sadness that i have found that only the connected and those in
attendance  at the F2F meetings are in position to alter the proposals.

I certanly hope that some will look to alternatives, for what i am seeing
( i do read all the mail ) is not open and transparent democracy unless it
is at a F2F meeting.

i hope electronic alternatives can be found.

Regards,

-Rick

On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Kent Crispin wrote:


> 
>   "Within four weeks after acceptance by the Corporation of this
>   application, the Names Council shall form itself initially by means
>   of a meeting of representatives of all entities that have
>   subscribed to the application in the form in which it is accepted
>   by the Corporation.  The meeting shall select an Initial Names
>   Council that shall have only the power to establish procedures for
>                                             ************************
>   the formation of the constituencies, the assessment of fees for the
>   ***********************************
>   start-up process and such further administrative steps as are
>   necessary to form the DNSO."
> 
> Note the underlined section

[snip]

> 
> -- 
> Kent Crispin, PAB Chair				"Do good, and you'll be
> kent@songbird.com				lonesome." -- Mark Twain
>